top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 34 points 2 years ago (13 children)

I support this group. No country can say they're doing something against climate change and also approve new oil drilling at the same time.

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago (10 children)

    Sure - but what do the attendees of a gaming conference have to do with new oil wells being approved?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I suspect it's for the publicity. Events like this attract different demographics than the usual targets, so it's more exposure. It might not make the tabloids but it does get reported on.

    Historically, any publicity has been seen as good publicity. But, given the reputation they are building, I think this is not how it is playing out.

    So I agree, it just makes people with little to no power feel blamed. Time for a change of approach.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (8 replies)
  • [–] 30 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (7 children)

    The heiress of a fossil fuel company provides money to a fund that funds them. Just Stop Oil says the majority of its funding comes from the Climate Emergency Fund. The fund, is founded by fossil fuel heiress Aileen Getty. Aileen Getty, is an heiress to the Getty family fortune established by oil magnate J. Paul Getty.

    https://www.lemonde.fr/en/environment/article/2022/11/03/aileen-getty-billionaire-proud-to-finance-environmental-activists-dramatic-actions_6002800_114.html

    It's just kind of bizarre to me...

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 32 points 2 years ago

    Hey if I found out my family fortune came from the slave trade I'd work against that. I imagine finding out your family's fortune came from the petroleum industry is pretty depressing when you look at our world - knowing that you profited on all this misery and loads more misery to come. Better to get out ahead of it, whether subconsciously or deliberately.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 13 points 2 years ago

    The most cynical view is that she funds them specifically because it makes climate protestors look bad. They are radical in their methods and their targets seem to just be random spaces where there is a larger(but not too large) public density.

    However the reality is probably more complicated. She might disagree with her grandfather and agree with their message, she might think that pulling funding would be worse PR than the few headlines that JSO generates, or she might not care one way or the other.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago

    She has no financial interest in the fossil fuel industry. At all.

    It is well documented that she is acting out of remorse over what happened and is trying to make things right. Again: She does not benefit from the fossil fuel industry at all. The story that she is a covert operative working for the fossil fuel industry has been debunked time and again. Stop the conspiracy stuff

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 14 points 2 years ago (15 children)

    Why at a games tournament? They should do this at an even that uses a lot of oil like Motorsport, marine etc.. Games don't use a lot of oil really lol

  • source
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 2 years ago (4 children)
  • load more comments (10 replies)
    [–] 11 points 2 years ago (31 children)

    That’ll certainly win them more hearts and minds. Sheesh

  • source
  • hideshow 31 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago (30 children)

    I used to be quite sympathetic but after seeing them blocking ambulances and trying to fuck up the day of people who otherwise agree, I hate them and hope they’re all arrested. And I’m not alone. Support for the climate movement has halved in two years in Germany because of these absolute morons.

    While 68 percent of those surveyed in 2021 said they fundamentally supported the climate movement, the figure in the current publication has halved to 34 percent. What is striking is that support has declined significantly in all social groups, even in more progressive milieus that were otherwise more open to the movement.

    When asked specifically about the "Last Generation" road blockades, 85 percent of those surveyed said they had no understanding of this form of protest.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 30 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

    but after seeing them blocking ambulances

    JSO in the UK have a very clear blue-light policy - ie get out of the way and let them pass - so this does not happen.

    Beyond that, the point of protest is that it's disruptive.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (29 replies)
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago

    Good for them!

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago* (3 children)

    Their tactics and the fact that a large portion of their funding comes from the granddaughter of an oil tycoon makes it hard to think their goal isn't to purposely look like jackasses to diminish support for real environmentalism.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 4 points 2 years ago

    Has it increased in size over the last few years? I always felt the venue at tobacco docks was kinda small.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago

    Severe OG at a video games tournament

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›