As you can all see, power can easily corrupt anyone.

all 30 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 68 points 1 year ago (9 children)

Power can corrupt, but Americans took corrupt and gave it the power. Again.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Power corrupts. Always. Every time. That's the basic idea behind democracy. You only get power for a limited time and you're bound by law and held accountable for breaking it. That's why besides free and fair elections the other pillars of democracy are rule of law and the separation of powers. Right now we can see in the US what happens when these principles are overturned.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 1 year ago

    Yeah man, Trump was clearly only corrupted when he got power...

  • source
  • [–] 24 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Hate to break it to you, but that dude was always corrupt.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    The fundamental problem is that, while the people grant power to representatives at elections, there is no mechanism to revoke it. For example, the Senate can impeach the president mid-term, but the people cannot. Nor can they remove their senators or congressional representatives.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    You say that like it would help us currently. We keep electing these people. We're clearly not collectively interested in removing them from power.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    That's why there are (were?) three branches with the intention of balancing each other to some degree. The Founders knew what could happen. They just didn't foresee two of the branches ceding their power to the executive.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    One of the three branches is nominated and confirmed by the other two branches, so you only really have to capture the senate and the presidency, as we have seen.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    Taking the judiciary is a long term project though. It's resistant to short term swings associated with the rise of autocrats. The problem is the Republicans have been moving in this direction for decades.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    The basic idea of the founders was good, but the US implementation of checks and balances is wildly outdated. There were several points where equivalent powers have proven disastrous in other countries over the last 3 centuries, and the US failed to act upon such data.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    Yeah, the president isn't even supposed to have that much power. It's the party-first subservience in the other two branches, especially the legislative branch, which is exacerbating the issue. And the fact that the state-level governments are bowing down to Der Leader whuch appear to be amplifying his bullshit.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago

    I think he was pretty clear about who he was for quite some time.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Yah we should get rid of the office of the president

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] [S] 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Congress has to impeach this guy next year.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago

    If this were a dictatorship it would be a heck of a lot easier... as long as I'm the dictator. Hehehe.

    I guess Dubya was kinda prophetic.

  • source
  • [+] -7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)

    And yet so many people on the left seem to think if only it was their guy terrorizing everyone things would be just peachy.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment