all 19 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 55 points 1 year ago (3 children)

https://youtu.be/AaKFx5rxdmA

He rigged the election and then told everyone he did.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    I've seen this article by so many different sites at least twice a day for the past 3 weeks. I get that people want to be optimistic and I totally wanna know what happened. However, I'd much rather wait for more information instead of recycling the same information every day. There is definitely something fishy going on here, but so far it's barely above a conspiracy theory at this point.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 1 year ago (4 children)
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Thank you, I really appreciate it. This is more of what I'm talking about. Post something like this instead of a random "feel good" article that has less than two paragraphs and a catchy headline.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • [–] 20 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Yeah, only bcz the trump administration yelled and squaked incessantly for 4 years that the election was rigged. So, saying something fishy happened is now seen as ridiculous bcz they filed so many damn frivolous lawsuits last time as to turn it into a god damn joke.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    And while I don't disagree with you, I just want new information to come out and for something to actually happen instead of just the general vibe of hope by seeing the same story every day. I want this just as bad as anyone else, but I also want something to hold onto. I can't hold onto the same spreadsheet of a few counties in New York from a month ago.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (5 children)
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    In a given population, you’re always going to have outliers. No population is THAT hermetically sealed.

    • Disproportionally low votes for Harris, combined with normal spreads for other reps and elections? Funky, maybe worth looking at, but not a smoking gun.
    • ZERO votes for Harris, combined with normal spreads for other reps and elections? That right there is a fucking HUGE smoking gun. That simply doesn’t happen in electoral statistics. It’s effectively impossible.
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment