What's interesting for me about this sort of phenomenon is that it relies on relative lack of morphological marks. It's somewhat easy to pull it off in English or Mandarin, but in Latin? Good luck. I'll demonstrate it borrowing the English words but conjugating/declining them natively:
- buffali Buffali buffalati a buffalis Buffali buffalos Buffali buffalant.
- animal.NOM city.GEN verb.PASS.NOM PREP animal.ABL city.GEN animal.ACC city.GEN verb.ACT.PRES.IND
(Ante: scio, scio, latine animalis est "bubalus" cum B, sed exemplum est melior cum FF.)
You could mess a bit with the word order to make it a bit clearer, or switch the passive with a subordinate like English does (but then "qui" is obligatory, and it helps a lot) but note how the endings disambiguate what's what, even with the syncretism (genitive singular and nominative plural being usually identical).
all 3 comments