nah, serfs had rights

not at all, the foundation of feudalism was serfs either paying rent for the land or paying a tax out of their production. the foundation of capitalism is wage labor. the intensives and motivations for everyone involved are fundamentally different in the 2 systems. The assertion just also doesnt make sense from a historical perspective capitalism came before any of the technology associated with it.

Its not. Feudalism was based on rent, capitalism is based on profit. Know your enemy

No. Feudalism was focused on rent extraction, but serfs produced the bulk of their own goods. Capitalism is based on competition and wage labor. These are both class systems, but they have different mechanisms and different "next stages."

It's a pro-police flag. It's supposed to represent the thin blue line between law and order. It's routinely used by people who support the police to a weird extent and as a counter symbol to the Black Lives Matter protests/movement.

It's the "thin blue line" flag, explicit support for the Police State.

It’s difficult to notice due to compression, but it has a blue stripe where one of the white stripes normally is.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue_Lives_Matter

No, Stalin's Russia was a paradise for all with zero issues, obviously.

In a way, yes. Capitalism paved the way for Proletarian revolution, which ultimately was a dramatic improvement on the largely unindustrialized and poor backwater Tsarist regime.

Stalin saved the world from fascism and liberals will never forgive him for it

The point is that it's a class war. It always has been. It's about a system of government where the country's wealth is concentrated into a small, ruling class of billionaires, who use the media they own to keep the lower classes fighting with each other while they . . . the rich . . . run off with all the farking money.

Oh wait. that's capitalism. Amazing how much soviet Russians government has in common with "capitalism."