A federal judge on Friday upheld a finding from the U.S. Copyright Office that a piece of art created by AI is not open to protection.

"In March, the copyright office affirmed that most works generated by AI aren’t copyrightable but clarified that AI-assisted materials qualify for protection in certain instances. An application for a work created with the help of AI can support a copyright claim if a human “selected or arranged” it in a “sufficiently creative way that the resulting work constitutes an original work of authorship,” it said."

Thaler was appealing this, and his appeal was denied.

other discussions
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/singularity by /u/JackFisherBooks on 2023-08-22 14:21:04.

 

A federal judge on Friday upheld a finding from the U.S. Copyright Office that a piece of art created by AI is not open to protection.

 

Article by the Hollywood Reporter: A federal court has reaffirmed that AI creations do not fall under copyright, a stance previously taken by the U.S. Copyright Office