top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 86 points 2 years ago

Winner looking at his electricity bill:

  • source
  • [–] 74 points 2 years ago* (4 children)

    Hey, I have worked on this exact machine before, neat to see they are finally decommissioning it. It would be a terrible purchase to actually use these days though, for the cost of moving and deploying it you could rock a few Hopper or Grace clusters that would outperform the cluster for less than half of the operating overhead.

    I fully expect it to get parted out, the actual components would be far more useful on their own as cheap homelab systems, and would be a much better ROI versus using it as is. This thing is water cooled, just the plumbing would be a nightmare to deal with if you aren't set up for it, and if you are you would be better off going with a modern architecture anyway.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago (3 children)
  • [–] 60 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (5 children)

    Power consumption: 1.7 MW

    I hope it stays decommissioned. We're burning up the planet too fast already, and old computers tend to be far less efficient than modern ones.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 50 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    The specs seem to be just enough to run a Minecraft server that doesn't freeze when one player explores new chunks.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 50 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Damn that’s crazy. When I was just out of college I built the touchscreen web app that promoted this thing in the lobby of UCAR. Looks like it’s still running for now: https://hpctv.ucar.edu

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 40 points 2 years ago

    The price will only be exceeded by the power bill for the electricity needed to run it.

  • source
  • [–] 36 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    This thing is basically the size of my apartment.

    Which means I have room! How much?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] [S] 29 points 2 years ago (6 children)

    Who wants to go in with me on this?

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    Let's turn it into a Lemmy server.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] 27 points 2 years ago (4 children)
  • [–] 13 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    And then programs it to play a nice game of chess

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 2 years ago (12 children)

    Seems like it's cheap to start the bidding at $2500 but the cheapest thing is probably the initial purchase price after moving it, buying the needed cabling, and electricity bills.

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 2 years ago* (7 children)

    I bet manpower costs are significant as well. How many people are needed to run this thing? You probably need engineers with an esoteric set of skills to put it back together and manage it which would not be cheap.

    Edit: I looked it up, it is running SUSE Enterprise Linux, so maybe management isn't as specialized as I expected.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    It may be running SLED, but just imagine all the specialized, tweaked af code running on top. They didn’t just pop in a LiveCD and click “Install”.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Whoever buys it will most likely just part it out and sell it on ebay.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago

    It's all Broadwell Xeons. Sure, there's 8000 of 'em, but after you factor in purchase price, moving and storage costs, time spent parting out nodes, shipping costs, etc... I think you'd have a hard time breaking even, and for an end user you can get like 4x the FLOPS per socket at half the power consumption with current server CPUs.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 24 points 2 years ago (6 children)

    It's kind of lame that they need to junk the entire apparatus after only a decade. I get that processor technology moves on apace but we already know it does that so why doesn't a universal architecture exist where nodes can be added at will?

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 2 years ago

    It's more of an operating cost issue. It's almost decade-old hardware. It was efficient in its day, but compared to new hardware it just costs so much to run you would be better served investing in something with modern efficiency. It won't be junked, it will be parted out. If you are someone that wants a cheap homelab with infiniband and shitloads of memory you could pick up a blade for a fraction of what it would otherwise cost. I fully expect it to turn into thousands of reasonably powerful servers for the prosumer and nerd markets instead of running as a monolithic cluster.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 2 years ago* (2 children)

    If you have too many "slow" modes in a super computer you'll hit a performance ceiling where everything is bottle necked by the speed of things that are not the CPU: memory, disk for swap, and network for sending partial results across nodes for further partial computing.

    Source: I've hang up too much around people doing PhD thesis in these kinds of problems.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 19 points 2 years ago (5 children)
  • [–] 18 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Please don't let crypto bros touch this

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 17 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Just might be powerful enough for SolidWorks not to crash

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    TIL that Silicon Graphics still exists...

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 12 points 2 years ago

    Let's just hope that it isn't bought up by Bitcoin miners . . .

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›