you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 98 points 2 years ago (3 children)

In my experience, 100% of executives don't actually know what their workforce does day-to-day, so it doesn't really surprise me that they think they can lay people off because they started using ChatGPT to write their emails.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 30 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    This was my immediate thought too. Even people 2-3 levels of management above me struggle to understand our job let alone the person 5-6 levels up in the executive suite.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 35 points 2 years ago

    At my last job my direct manager had to explain to upper management multiple times that X role and Y role could not be combined because it would require someone to physically be in multiple places simultaneously. I think about that a lot when I hear about these corporate plans to automate the workforce.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago

    However, people saying that C-suite can be replaced with GPTs don't understand that plenty of people not in C-suite could be replaced or not replaced just as well. Lots of office plankton around with such reasoning skills that I just don't know how their work can bring profit.

    I can't decide whether those people are really needed or they are employed so that they wouldn't collectively lynch those of us who'd keep relevance, but wouldn't be social enough to defend from that doom.

    The problem with building hierarchies of humans is with humans politicking and lying and scheming with each other, not even talking about usual stuff like friendship and sympathy and their opposites. It's just impossible to see what's really happening behind all that.

  • source
  • parent