▲ 330 ▼ Open Source Infrastructure must be a publicly funded service. - Matrix.org (matrix.org) submitted 2 years ago by lemmyreader@lemmy.ml to c/opensource@lemmy.ml 40 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] tcit@beehaw.org 4 points 2 years ago (3 children) This post is by the Matrix foundation, not Element. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] dsemy@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago (2 children) This post was made by the CEO and founder of Element permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] tcit@beehaw.org 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) And ? Obviously it's not the for-profit structure which would benefit from donations. VC money is one way of financing things (which has the cash burn rate issue), public money and donations is another, why would changing from one model to another be something bad? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] dsemy@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago Why is it obvious? See https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-spec/issues/571 Literally only the last comment gives any real data about how that money is being spent (and the annual report mentioned hasn't been published yet). I think the change is positive in general, but they really haven't done a good job w.r.t transparency, and the Matrix ecosystem is still reliant on a for-profit company. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] dsemy@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago (2 children) This post was made by the CEO and founder of Element permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] tcit@beehaw.org 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) And ? Obviously it's not the for-profit structure which would benefit from donations. VC money is one way of financing things (which has the cash burn rate issue), public money and donations is another, why would changing from one model to another be something bad? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] dsemy@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago Why is it obvious? See https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-spec/issues/571 Literally only the last comment gives any real data about how that money is being spent (and the annual report mentioned hasn't been published yet). I think the change is positive in general, but they really haven't done a good job w.r.t transparency, and the Matrix ecosystem is still reliant on a for-profit company. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] tcit@beehaw.org 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) And ? Obviously it's not the for-profit structure which would benefit from donations. VC money is one way of financing things (which has the cash burn rate issue), public money and donations is another, why would changing from one model to another be something bad? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] dsemy@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago Why is it obvious? See https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-spec/issues/571 Literally only the last comment gives any real data about how that money is being spent (and the annual report mentioned hasn't been published yet). I think the change is positive in general, but they really haven't done a good job w.r.t transparency, and the Matrix ecosystem is still reliant on a for-profit company. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] dsemy@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago Why is it obvious? See https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-spec/issues/571 Literally only the last comment gives any real data about how that money is being spent (and the annual report mentioned hasn't been published yet). I think the change is positive in general, but they really haven't done a good job w.r.t transparency, and the Matrix ecosystem is still reliant on a for-profit company. permalink fedilink source parent