▲ -120 ▼ I Think I Am Committing Voter Fraud (lemmy.dbzer0.com) submitted 2 years ago by Zuberi@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/memes@lemmy.ml 82 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Zuberi@lemmy.dbzer0.com [S] -1 points 2 years ago (4 children) So a 3rd party doesn't add +1 to Trump's total vote count? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] null@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 years ago (2 children) Of course not, that's a false premise. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Zuberi@lemmy.dbzer0.com [S] -1 points 2 years ago (1 child) Hmm, maybe tell that to the 3+ people who wrote out the "proofs" of that math? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] null@slrpnk.net 6 points 2 years ago* Plenty of people already have And its one person. permalink fedilink source parent [–] HopFlop@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 years ago A 3rd party votes subtracts one vote from Biden's total vote count, so to say. Here is the 1M$ math equation you desire (assuming you would usually vote for Biden): Definitions: (I) VoteDifference = VotesTrump - VotesBiden (II) VotesBiden1 = EveryoneElsesVotes + YourVote (Scenario where you vote for Biden) (III) VotesBiden2 = EveryoneElsesVotes (Scenario where you vote for a 3rd party) Calculations: (II) VotesBiden1 = EveryoneElsesVotes + Yourvote =〉VotesBiden1 - YourVote = EveryoneElsesVotes (III) VotesBiden2 = EveryoneElsesVotes =〉VotesBiden1 - YourVote = VotesBiden2 (I) VoteDifference = VotesTrump - VotesBiden VoteDifference1 = VotesTrump - VotesBiden1 VoteDifference2 = VotesTrump - VotesBiden2 =〉VoteDifference2 = VotesTrump - (VotesBiden1 - Yourvote) =〉VoteDifference2 = VotesTrump + YourVote - VotesBiden1 (!!!) THUS WE CONCLUDE: In scenario 2 (which is the one in which you vote for a 3rd party), the vote difference (which determines who won and by how much), is EQUIVALENT to one additional person voting for Trump. You're welcome. I don't even need the 1.000.000$. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] null@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 years ago (2 children) Of course not, that's a false premise. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Zuberi@lemmy.dbzer0.com [S] -1 points 2 years ago (1 child) Hmm, maybe tell that to the 3+ people who wrote out the "proofs" of that math? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] null@slrpnk.net 6 points 2 years ago* Plenty of people already have And its one person. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Zuberi@lemmy.dbzer0.com [S] -1 points 2 years ago (1 child) Hmm, maybe tell that to the 3+ people who wrote out the "proofs" of that math? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] null@slrpnk.net 6 points 2 years ago* Plenty of people already have And its one person. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] null@slrpnk.net 6 points 2 years ago* Plenty of people already have And its one person. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] HopFlop@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 years ago A 3rd party votes subtracts one vote from Biden's total vote count, so to say. Here is the 1M$ math equation you desire (assuming you would usually vote for Biden): Definitions: (I) VoteDifference = VotesTrump - VotesBiden (II) VotesBiden1 = EveryoneElsesVotes + YourVote (Scenario where you vote for Biden) (III) VotesBiden2 = EveryoneElsesVotes (Scenario where you vote for a 3rd party) Calculations: (II) VotesBiden1 = EveryoneElsesVotes + Yourvote =〉VotesBiden1 - YourVote = EveryoneElsesVotes (III) VotesBiden2 = EveryoneElsesVotes =〉VotesBiden1 - YourVote = VotesBiden2 (I) VoteDifference = VotesTrump - VotesBiden VoteDifference1 = VotesTrump - VotesBiden1 VoteDifference2 = VotesTrump - VotesBiden2 =〉VoteDifference2 = VotesTrump - (VotesBiden1 - Yourvote) =〉VoteDifference2 = VotesTrump + YourVote - VotesBiden1 (!!!) THUS WE CONCLUDE: In scenario 2 (which is the one in which you vote for a 3rd party), the vote difference (which determines who won and by how much), is EQUIVALENT to one additional person voting for Trump. You're welcome. I don't even need the 1.000.000$. permalink fedilink source parent