Who would have thought this would have happened?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] [S] -16 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (30 children)
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago (27 children)

    Your belief in a fair market has you blaming all the wrong people for all the wrong things.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 27 child comments
  • [+] [S] -11 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (26 children)
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago (25 children)

    You stand alone in your argument sir.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 25 child comments
  • [+] [S] -10 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (24 children)
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago (23 children)

    If a company can't afford to pay their employees a livable wage, they deserve to go under. Yeah it sucks for the workers but so does staying with a company that can't pay them. Stop licking boots.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 23 child comments
  • [+] [S] -12 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (22 children)
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago* (21 children)

    "He did blame it on the minimum wage increase. Although, from my understanding, I think we were exempt from it because of the amount of locations that he personally owns. But, he did ultimately blame it on that increase," she said.

    How about this for a new title: "Salty Restaurant owner doesn't like new law that doesn't apply to him, fires everyone anyway"

    Gotta love the free market, right?

    You're licking corporate boot to defend shitty business practices.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 21 child comments
  • [+] [S] -10 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (20 children)
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago (19 children)

    I believe the article over you.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • [+] [S] -8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (18 children)
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago (17 children)

    The law says it only applies to businesses that have over 60 locations nationwide. Back in real life and not “woah conservative bro I’m so traumatized” world, Fosters Freeze has 62 locations. So to avoid this law, they’d have to close 3 of them. Also not sure whether it applies to franchisees, and I’m sure you have absolutely no idea either.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [+] [S] -3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (16 children)
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (15 children)

    No, I think they should figure out how to be profitable enough to pay their employees enough to live on in California. Not sure why that’s a difficult concept.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [+] [S] -4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (14 children)
  • [+] 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (13 children)
  • [+] [S] -4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (12 children)
  • [+] 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (11 children)
  • [+] [S] -4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (10 children)
  • [+] 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (9 children)
  • [+] [S] -4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (8 children)
  • [+] 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (7 children)
  • [+] [S] -4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (6 children)
  • [+] 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (5 children)
  • [+] [S] -4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children)
  • [+] 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    With the raising cost of living, the job market is going to shrink, minimum wage increase or not. It just means that the more fortunate need to pay more to those who are less fortunate if they want to employ someone.

    The market obviously can't regulate itself correctly and needs a little nudge if someone can't make a living wage from a full-time job. It's not normal for someone working their asses off full-time and still barely make ends meet and living in squalor. Someone has to give, and these employees are already giving their fair share, it's justified to ensure they get their slice of the pie.

    If they can't afford to pay a decent wage, then that job has no reason to exist.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment