He presented his logic and included well-recognised definitions and sources. He literally could not have done better without a peer review in the field 🤣🤣

So: shut up bitch

Don’t try to strawman this. Human rights are violated when someone is deprived of their property (their data in the case at hand). If food is withheld from starving people in Gaza, your argument is like saying:

“Claims human rights are being violated because someone failed to drive a truck”