2064
[meme] Trains are 100000x easier to electrify and automate than cars, so why does everyone keep talking about electric and driverless cars? (lemmy.world)
submitted 3 years ago by to c/fuckcars@lemmy.world
565 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 3 years ago* (5 children)

Sure, if we can build the infrastructure for cars there, why not trains too. You're quite closed minded. But also, why can't you just bike in a village? I mentioned cities because that's where trains tend to be, genius.

There's trams, there's bikes, there's buses, etc. etc. etc.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Sure, I'll just bike through 4 feet of snow to get to town. Roads don't need to fall within specific tolerances to operate either, like tracks. Have you ever been to the country? Anywhere that snows? You sound like "city folk" to me and you throwing around "closed minded" and "genius" when someone else brings up a contradictory point makes you sound more like "city asshole". Maybe keep the conversation civil, eh?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] -2 points 3 years ago

    There are several alternatives to trains. It was the appropriate example for cities. This is dead simple. If you're gonna be a condescending, mocking asshole all while completely missing the point, you're gonna get some sass. Simple as, fuck off if you can't handle it.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 1 point 3 years ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)
    [deleted]
  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •