The mods of all the major communities there remove comments criticism Hexbear and usually follow it up with a ban. It's absolutely clear what is happening and it shouldn't be allowed to continue.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 34 points 2 years ago (32 children)

Moreover, it seems pretty clear to me that .ml intends to keep their finger on the scale as much as possible. Just saying "oh federation solves all the problems just block them" doesn't really fix the issue when there are a bunch of ways they can potentially run malicious versions of the code base to mess with how federation functions and hold onto their influence. For example, they are already refusing to federate their mod logs in some cases, and they've shown themselves to be completely shameless and hypocritical when it comes to banning any and all dissent. They simply cannot be trusted.

I personally believe that the broader fediverse should seriously consider taking serious steps to cut out .ml before they do something drastic to fuck it all up

  • source
  • hideshow 32 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 2 years ago (30 children)

    They also manipulated the modlog on their site to not differentiate between removed by mod and removed by admin. So even When something is removed by Dessalines or Nutomic it'll still show as moderator and not admin in the mod log.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 30 child comments
  • [+] -6 points 2 years ago (29 children)

    That your lies get any upvotes is quite sad, i thought people on lemmy were tech savvy. I'm not and even i can see that you're making this stuff up.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 29 child comments
  • [+] 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (28 children)
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago (27 children)

    Where is the proof please? As far as i can see, the lemmy.world modlog is the outlier, not the lemmy.ml one.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 27 child comments
  • [+] 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (26 children)
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago* (24 children)

    Sorry but i cannot find anything. If the proof for Draconic's claims is so obvious and plenty, please be so kind and link at least one bit to me. The only thing i could find that seems like some kind of "proof" is the screenshot @Draconic_NEO posted. How they got to take it i have no idea, not saying they drew it in paint, but here is what it looks like on my side (same mod actions):

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 24 child comments
  • [+] -3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (21 children)
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (20 children)

    no evidence has been provided though

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 20 child comments
  • [+] 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (19 children)
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago (18 children)

    it's not about whether I agree,it's about whether it shows what is being claimed

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [+] 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (17 children)
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago* (14 children)

    a claim made without evidence can be dismissed without evidence. you are responsible for supporting your own position. I wouldn't ask you to find evidence to support my position. that would be silly.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [+] 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (13 children)
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago (12 children)

    no evidence has been provided though. and your accusation of bad faith is, itself, bad faith.

    and I thought you were done.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [+] 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (11 children)
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago* (10 children)

    They're right - You've said about 10 times "evidence has been provided" instead of taking ten seconds to add a link?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [+] 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (9 children)
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (8 children)

    I've had so many Lemmy.ml users argue in bad faith I usually don't talk to them anymore.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [+] 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children)
  • [+] -1 points 2 years ago (3 children)
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    I'm calling you insane now take your valuable time to go find proof so I can respond in bad faith

    After a while it's just not worth engaging anymore. I used to have a very positive attitude and the fediverse and would happy engage with lemmy.ml users. I'm fine wasting my time, it's what they want.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)
  • [+] -20 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

    doesn’t really fix the issue when there are a bunch of ways they can potentially run malicious versions of the code base to mess with how federation functions and hold onto their influence.

    This is hysteria of Chinese spy balloon proportions 😂

    I can no longer sit back and allow Communist infiltration, Communist indoctrination, Communist subversion, and the international Communist conspiracy to sap and impurify all of our precious bodily fluids.

  • source
  • parent