PC Gaming

pcgaming@lemmy.ca

15,377 readers

4,340 active

94 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

Be Respectful.
No Spam or Porn.
No Advertising.
No Memes.
No Tech Support.
No questions about buying/building computers.
No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 3 years ago

moderators

EXiLExJD@lemmy.ca

UncleBadTouch@lemmy.ca

KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com

In 2018 a group of Valve staff tried to figure out just how efficient they were being—and found they were making more money per head than Apple, Facebook, and nearly every tech giant out there (www.pcgamer.com)

submitted 2 years ago by alessandro@lemmy.ca to c/pcgaming@lemmy.ca

206 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] 3volver@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Last time I checked, Epic Games has plenty of money to compete. Monopoly implies competition is actively being stopped. Valve hasn't done much to stop competition other than making a good product that people use.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 4 child comments

[–] kaffiene@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago

No it doesn't. Anticompetittive behaviour is a seperate issue. One often imployed by monopolists, but seperate nonetheless.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

[–] NotAtWork@startrek.website 1 point 2 years ago

Epic Games also takes 5% of all games that use the Unreal engine, unless you use the Epic store.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

lemmy:	0.19.20
mlmym (mschae):	26.3.4