▲ 491 ▼ In Cringe Video, OpenAI CTO Says She Doesn’t Know Where Sora’s Training Data Came From (futurism.com) submitted 2 years ago by ylai@lemmy.ml to c/technology@lemmy.world 181 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] phoneymouse@lemmy.world 87 points 2 years ago (3 children) There is no way in hell it isn’t copyrighted material. permalink fedilink source hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] abhibeckert@lemmy.world 62 points 2 years ago* (2 children) Every video ever created is copyrighted. The question is — do they need a license? Time will tell. This is obviously going to court. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Kazumara@feddit.de 39 points 2 years ago Don't downvote this guy. He's mostly right. Creative works have copyright protections from the moment they are created. The relevant question is indeed if they have the relevant permissions for their use, not wether it had protections in the first place. Maybe some surveillance camera footage is not sufficiently creative to get protections, but that's hardly going to be good for machine reinforcement learning. permalink fedilink source parent [–] iknowitwheniseeit@lemmynsfw.com 12 points 2 years ago There are definitely non copyrighted videos! Both old videos (all still black and white I think) and also things released into the public domain by copyright holders. But for sure that's a very small subset of videos. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] abhibeckert@lemmy.world 62 points 2 years ago* (2 children) Every video ever created is copyrighted. The question is — do they need a license? Time will tell. This is obviously going to court. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Kazumara@feddit.de 39 points 2 years ago Don't downvote this guy. He's mostly right. Creative works have copyright protections from the moment they are created. The relevant question is indeed if they have the relevant permissions for their use, not wether it had protections in the first place. Maybe some surveillance camera footage is not sufficiently creative to get protections, but that's hardly going to be good for machine reinforcement learning. permalink fedilink source parent [–] iknowitwheniseeit@lemmynsfw.com 12 points 2 years ago There are definitely non copyrighted videos! Both old videos (all still black and white I think) and also things released into the public domain by copyright holders. But for sure that's a very small subset of videos. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Kazumara@feddit.de 39 points 2 years ago Don't downvote this guy. He's mostly right. Creative works have copyright protections from the moment they are created. The relevant question is indeed if they have the relevant permissions for their use, not wether it had protections in the first place. Maybe some surveillance camera footage is not sufficiently creative to get protections, but that's hardly going to be good for machine reinforcement learning. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] iknowitwheniseeit@lemmynsfw.com 12 points 2 years ago There are definitely non copyrighted videos! Both old videos (all still black and white I think) and also things released into the public domain by copyright holders. But for sure that's a very small subset of videos. permalink fedilink source parent