you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 21 points 2 years ago (7 children)

Sounds like a Sony Trinitron to me. I had a 17" one for about a decade and it was equally magnificent and heavy. The largest one was 24" 16:10 widescreen.

https://aperturegrille.fandom.com/wiki/SONY_GDM-FW900

I wanted one so badly, but while these were finally somewhat affordable in 2010 (and still vastly superior to any flat-screen monitor), the shipping costs would have been ruinous.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    So in what way were they better? Back in the day, even he didn't know, the only answer i got from him was that tge screen was flat. I didn't really bother anymore because that was also the year people started showing up with flatscreens.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago*

    Sharper and brighter images for a while. The aperture grille design allowed more light through than the shadow masks for a while until shadow mask manufacturing quality caught up in the late '80s. The flat screen offered a simpler geometry that allowed for sharper images until the old school CRT manufacturing caught up in the mid '90s. By the early '00s, there were really no advantages and they were riding on name recognition as a superior brand until the late 00's when LCDs finally overcame their size and price hurdles.

  • source
  • parent