One of the comments reads : Actually, we will probably never figure out, was it man or woman. but I thought this comment of the professor was an interesting eye opener. https://mastodonapp.uk/@MarkHoltom/112070436760917344

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 17 points 2 years ago* (7 children)

I'm not sure why the sex of the ancient person who did it, matters.

Make that a common sentiment and a good chunk of the division surrounding modern discourse goes away. People care way too much about genitals both in the past and present.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago

    Not only what your genitalia is, but what you do with it, seems to be a top priority for far too many people. They're not your genitals, so maybe don't worry about it?

    But "God" or something. I don't know.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (5 children)

    Not sure why you phrased that as correcting them when you were agreeing and adding to it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I didn't take it as a correction. More of a clarification. I omitted some extraneous detail that they added. I felt it was implied well enough by context that it didn't need to be said, obviously they wanted to add more clarity to the statement.

    In my mind the two statements are identical, except that mine relies on context and theirs is a bit more explicit in what is said.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    I don't think that's phrased as a correction. It clearly wasn't as you noted

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments