this post was submitted on 29 Feb 2024
852 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

60076 readers
3359 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 52 points 9 months ago (6 children)

I believe USB-C is the only connector supported for carrying DisplayPort signals other than DisplayPort itself.

The biggest issue with USB-C for display in my opinion is that cable specs vary so much. A cable with a type c end could carry anywhere from 60-10000MB/s and deliver anywhere from 5-240W. What's worse is that most aren't labeled, so even if you know what spec you need you're going to have a hell of a time finding it in a pile of identical black cables.

Not that I dislike USB-C. It's a great connector, but the branding of USB has always been a mess.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

would be neat to somehow have a standard color coding. kinda how USB 3 is (usually) blue, maybe there could be thin bands of color on the connector?

better yet, maybe some raised bumps so visually impaired people could feel what type it was. for example one dot is USB 2, two could be USB 3, etc

[–] [email protected] 20 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Have you looked at the naming of the usb standards? No you havn't otherwise you wouldn't make this sensible suggestion.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

the shenenigans with USB 3 naming you mean? you're right, this would be too logical for USB lol

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Don't worry, they made it worse with usb 4.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

USB 3.2 2x2 with 20 Gbps is the same as USB 4 Gen 2×2 with 20 Gbps

USB 4 Gen3x2 has 40 Gbps and was then renamed to USB 4 1.0

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago

jesus what the fuck

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

Please think of the shareholders... :(

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I think that the biggest issue with dp over usbc is that people are going to try to use the same cable for 4k and large data transfers at the same time, and will then whine about weird behaviour.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

4K works for mine (it's 3.2).

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

Yep, very true. I didn't understand this until I couldn't connect my Mac to my screen via the USB C given with the computer, I had to buy another (and order it in specifically). Pick up a cable, and I have no idea which version it is.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

Dont forget the limited length. I cant remember exactly but usb c delivering power has a max length of arpund 4 metres

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

Yeah I have multiple USB cables, some at 30w, and some at 140w. Get them mixed up all the time! More companies need to at least brand the wattage on the connectors.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago

This is the big issue I have with with "USB C". USB c is just the connector which can be used for so many things. What actual is supported depends on things you can't see, like the cable construction or what the device supports.