▲ 47 ▼ Ukraine Crushingly Defeated at ICJ (english.almayadeen.net) submitted 2 years ago by Trudge@lemmygrad.ml to c/worldnews@lemmygrad.ml 25 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] MarxMadness@lemmygrad.ml 19 points 2 years ago (1 child) 🤓 uhh I believe you're thinking of the ICC https://iccforum.com/africa permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] lonewolfhashashinOKEPICMODE@hexbear.net 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) I'm talking about the Hague, if you're not kidding permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] MarxMadness@lemmygrad.ml 18 points 2 years ago (1 child) Not kidding, other than making a nerd-shit technical point. Both the ICJ and ICC are located in The Hague. The ICC is the one with the reputation for excessive focus on Africa and the one the U.S. has legislation against (The "Hague Invasion Act"). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] lonewolfhashashinOKEPICMODE@hexbear.net 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) Okay so the ICJ is the part that's more for negotiating UN shit? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] MarxMadness@lemmygrad.ml 13 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Countries are the parties in the ICJ, which dates to the founding of the UN and includes almost every country (if not every country, period). One country has to bring an action against another (see South Africa's case against Israel). The subject matter can be criminal or civil -- I think most ICJ cases have been the latter, think territorial or fishing rights disputes. The ICC was founded in 2002, a bunch of major countries (including the U.S., Russia, and China) aren't signatories, and it (not specific countries) prosecutes individuals for international crimes (so no civil disputes). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ComradeEd@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 2 years ago if not every country, period Pretty much, yes. Article 93 makes all UN members parties to the court's statute. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] lonewolfhashashinOKEPICMODE@hexbear.net 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) I'm talking about the Hague, if you're not kidding permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] MarxMadness@lemmygrad.ml 18 points 2 years ago (1 child) Not kidding, other than making a nerd-shit technical point. Both the ICJ and ICC are located in The Hague. The ICC is the one with the reputation for excessive focus on Africa and the one the U.S. has legislation against (The "Hague Invasion Act"). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] lonewolfhashashinOKEPICMODE@hexbear.net 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) Okay so the ICJ is the part that's more for negotiating UN shit? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] MarxMadness@lemmygrad.ml 13 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Countries are the parties in the ICJ, which dates to the founding of the UN and includes almost every country (if not every country, period). One country has to bring an action against another (see South Africa's case against Israel). The subject matter can be criminal or civil -- I think most ICJ cases have been the latter, think territorial or fishing rights disputes. The ICC was founded in 2002, a bunch of major countries (including the U.S., Russia, and China) aren't signatories, and it (not specific countries) prosecutes individuals for international crimes (so no civil disputes). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ComradeEd@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 2 years ago if not every country, period Pretty much, yes. Article 93 makes all UN members parties to the court's statute. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] MarxMadness@lemmygrad.ml 18 points 2 years ago (1 child) Not kidding, other than making a nerd-shit technical point. Both the ICJ and ICC are located in The Hague. The ICC is the one with the reputation for excessive focus on Africa and the one the U.S. has legislation against (The "Hague Invasion Act"). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] lonewolfhashashinOKEPICMODE@hexbear.net 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) Okay so the ICJ is the part that's more for negotiating UN shit? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] MarxMadness@lemmygrad.ml 13 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Countries are the parties in the ICJ, which dates to the founding of the UN and includes almost every country (if not every country, period). One country has to bring an action against another (see South Africa's case against Israel). The subject matter can be criminal or civil -- I think most ICJ cases have been the latter, think territorial or fishing rights disputes. The ICC was founded in 2002, a bunch of major countries (including the U.S., Russia, and China) aren't signatories, and it (not specific countries) prosecutes individuals for international crimes (so no civil disputes). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ComradeEd@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 2 years ago if not every country, period Pretty much, yes. Article 93 makes all UN members parties to the court's statute. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] lonewolfhashashinOKEPICMODE@hexbear.net 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) Okay so the ICJ is the part that's more for negotiating UN shit? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] MarxMadness@lemmygrad.ml 13 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Countries are the parties in the ICJ, which dates to the founding of the UN and includes almost every country (if not every country, period). One country has to bring an action against another (see South Africa's case against Israel). The subject matter can be criminal or civil -- I think most ICJ cases have been the latter, think territorial or fishing rights disputes. The ICC was founded in 2002, a bunch of major countries (including the U.S., Russia, and China) aren't signatories, and it (not specific countries) prosecutes individuals for international crimes (so no civil disputes). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ComradeEd@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 2 years ago if not every country, period Pretty much, yes. Article 93 makes all UN members parties to the court's statute. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] MarxMadness@lemmygrad.ml 13 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Countries are the parties in the ICJ, which dates to the founding of the UN and includes almost every country (if not every country, period). One country has to bring an action against another (see South Africa's case against Israel). The subject matter can be criminal or civil -- I think most ICJ cases have been the latter, think territorial or fishing rights disputes. The ICC was founded in 2002, a bunch of major countries (including the U.S., Russia, and China) aren't signatories, and it (not specific countries) prosecutes individuals for international crimes (so no civil disputes). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ComradeEd@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 2 years ago if not every country, period Pretty much, yes. Article 93 makes all UN members parties to the court's statute. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ComradeEd@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 2 years ago if not every country, period Pretty much, yes. Article 93 makes all UN members parties to the court's statute. permalink fedilink source parent