▲ 823 ▼ Elon Musk Bought Twitter to Settle His Jet-Tracking Beef, New Book Claims (gizmodo.com) submitted 2 years ago by AnActOfCreation@programming.dev to c/technology@lemmy.world 176 comments fedilink hide all child comments Elon Musk purchased shares of Twitter after unsuccessfully petitioning the CEO to remove a Twitter account tracking his private jet. Musk's personal gripes played a key role in his $44 billion acquisition of Twitter. Musk banned the account after promising not to, highlighting his prioritization of getting his way over free speech. Archive link: https://archive.ph/ttBv9
[–] shasta@lemm.ee 8 points 2 years ago (7 children) Pretty sure that's illegal permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] Scrof@sopuli.xyz 27 points 2 years ago (3 children) That's his entire business model. Just look at starship, hyper loop, solar roofs and Tesla semi. Overblown Tesla stock bubble too. All complete vaporware, but he profits greatly from the hype alone. He belongs in prison as he is a classic conman. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] laverabe@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago* (2 children) As much as I personally dislike Musk, Starship does not belong on that list. It is the largest and most powerful space vehicle humanity has ever launched successfully and landed! It is re-usable and can potentially carry up to 100 people or 300,000 lbs of cargo. Nothing like that has ever been done before, and the advancements in science that will follow humanities expansion into space cannot be overstated. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] laughterlaughter@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) 100 people are, like, 19,000 lbs. Why the weight difference between 100 people and just cargo? Because of life support systems? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] laverabe@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago 1 ton per person for living quarters, supplies, etc. I'm not sure if life support is part of that, and also not sure how exactly they settled on 1 ton. SpaceX has stated that Starship, in its "baseline reuseable design", will have a payload capacity of 100–150 t (220,000–331,000 lb) https://wikipedia.org/wiki/SpaceX_Starship permalink fedilink source parent [–] RealFknNito@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago So is racking up debt in shell companies and claiming bankruptcy on them but it didn't stop Trump either. permalink fedilink source parent [–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago When has that stopped billionaire dummasses? permalink fedilink source parent [–] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago People who control the organs of communication usually end up writing the laws, even if it's at arm's length. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Scrof@sopuli.xyz 27 points 2 years ago (3 children) That's his entire business model. Just look at starship, hyper loop, solar roofs and Tesla semi. Overblown Tesla stock bubble too. All complete vaporware, but he profits greatly from the hype alone. He belongs in prison as he is a classic conman. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] laverabe@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago* (2 children) As much as I personally dislike Musk, Starship does not belong on that list. It is the largest and most powerful space vehicle humanity has ever launched successfully and landed! It is re-usable and can potentially carry up to 100 people or 300,000 lbs of cargo. Nothing like that has ever been done before, and the advancements in science that will follow humanities expansion into space cannot be overstated. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] laughterlaughter@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) 100 people are, like, 19,000 lbs. Why the weight difference between 100 people and just cargo? Because of life support systems? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] laverabe@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago 1 ton per person for living quarters, supplies, etc. I'm not sure if life support is part of that, and also not sure how exactly they settled on 1 ton. SpaceX has stated that Starship, in its "baseline reuseable design", will have a payload capacity of 100–150 t (220,000–331,000 lb) https://wikipedia.org/wiki/SpaceX_Starship permalink fedilink source parent
[–] laverabe@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago* (2 children) As much as I personally dislike Musk, Starship does not belong on that list. It is the largest and most powerful space vehicle humanity has ever launched successfully and landed! It is re-usable and can potentially carry up to 100 people or 300,000 lbs of cargo. Nothing like that has ever been done before, and the advancements in science that will follow humanities expansion into space cannot be overstated. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] laughterlaughter@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) 100 people are, like, 19,000 lbs. Why the weight difference between 100 people and just cargo? Because of life support systems? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] laverabe@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago 1 ton per person for living quarters, supplies, etc. I'm not sure if life support is part of that, and also not sure how exactly they settled on 1 ton. SpaceX has stated that Starship, in its "baseline reuseable design", will have a payload capacity of 100–150 t (220,000–331,000 lb) https://wikipedia.org/wiki/SpaceX_Starship permalink fedilink source parent
[–] laughterlaughter@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) 100 people are, like, 19,000 lbs. Why the weight difference between 100 people and just cargo? Because of life support systems? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] laverabe@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago 1 ton per person for living quarters, supplies, etc. I'm not sure if life support is part of that, and also not sure how exactly they settled on 1 ton. SpaceX has stated that Starship, in its "baseline reuseable design", will have a payload capacity of 100–150 t (220,000–331,000 lb) https://wikipedia.org/wiki/SpaceX_Starship permalink fedilink source parent
[–] laverabe@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago 1 ton per person for living quarters, supplies, etc. I'm not sure if life support is part of that, and also not sure how exactly they settled on 1 ton. SpaceX has stated that Starship, in its "baseline reuseable design", will have a payload capacity of 100–150 t (220,000–331,000 lb) https://wikipedia.org/wiki/SpaceX_Starship permalink fedilink source parent
[–] RealFknNito@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago So is racking up debt in shell companies and claiming bankruptcy on them but it didn't stop Trump either. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago When has that stopped billionaire dummasses? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago People who control the organs of communication usually end up writing the laws, even if it's at arm's length. permalink fedilink source parent