▲ 109 ▼ It's official: Smartphones will need to have replaceable batteries by 2027 (www.androidauthority.com) submitted 3 years ago by Mystify0771@kbin.social to c/tech@kbin.social 33 comments fedilink hide all child comments Do you miss phones with replaceable batteries? By 2027, you won't anymore because, by law, almost every smartphone will have them again.
[–] Psiczar@aussie.zone 2 points 3 years ago (5 children) I’ve never owned a smartphone with a removable battery and I don’t feel like I ever needed one. As a mostly iPhone user, will this mean we go back to phones with plastic bodies? permalink fedilink source hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] HeartyBeast@kbin.social 13 points 3 years ago (1 child) of course not. It might mean a slightly thicker phone, but with a bit of smart engineering and a regulatory incentive, I'd expect something quite elegant. Think about how your SIM tray pops out. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] takeda@kbin.social 6 points 3 years ago* I absolutely love how LG G5 handled it: https://youtu.be/8l4QHBMpXLo That is, until they also jumped on the non removable battery bandwagon. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Saganastic@kbin.social 11 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (1 child) Replaceable batteries were great. I could keep phones going for years until Samsung started pumping out bloated software updates that slowed them down. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AnonymousLlama@kbin.social 4 points 3 years ago When we had replaceable batteries you could just buy a new one and performance issues would be corrected almost immediately. Apple was sneaky AF about this back in the day, throttling performance in an attempt to increase battery life, something that wouldn't be needed if you could easily swap out the battery every few years permalink fedilink source parent [–] Teal@lemmy.world 5 points 3 years ago That wouldn't be necessary. I had a metal phone with a replaceable battery (Motorola SLVR L7). It was more common for a cellphone to be made of plastic in the replaceable battery days because most phones were still far more utilitarian and thought of for talking, text messages, email if you had a data plan and of course Snake. Lightweight and small was popular before large screens and smart features came along. One exception was the push-to-talk phones geared towards construction workers. Those suckers were chunky. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Pons_Aelius@kbin.social 3 points 3 years ago Counterpoint: I've never owned a smartphone without a removable battery as I see it as a requirement. This is encouraging news for me. permalink fedilink source parent [–] AnonymousLlama@kbin.social 1 point 3 years ago* I remember using the Samsung Galaxy S2 which is ancient by today's standards, but one thing I remember distinctly was how super convenient it was to be able to pull the back off and switch out the battery, it reminded me of the simplicity of swapping batteries on a DSLR camera. Some people mentioned that you'll drop your phone and the battery will just fly out. I don't remember ever having that happen and my S2 had a rough life. The one part I feel is valid criticism is water resistance, manufacturers will have to actually work on their designs to get IP resistance now. As much as I love waterproof phones, I'd much rather be able to have a spare battery than think about what happens if I drop it in water permalink fedilink source parent
[–] HeartyBeast@kbin.social 13 points 3 years ago (1 child) of course not. It might mean a slightly thicker phone, but with a bit of smart engineering and a regulatory incentive, I'd expect something quite elegant. Think about how your SIM tray pops out. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] takeda@kbin.social 6 points 3 years ago* I absolutely love how LG G5 handled it: https://youtu.be/8l4QHBMpXLo That is, until they also jumped on the non removable battery bandwagon. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] takeda@kbin.social 6 points 3 years ago* I absolutely love how LG G5 handled it: https://youtu.be/8l4QHBMpXLo That is, until they also jumped on the non removable battery bandwagon. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Saganastic@kbin.social 11 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (1 child) Replaceable batteries were great. I could keep phones going for years until Samsung started pumping out bloated software updates that slowed them down. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AnonymousLlama@kbin.social 4 points 3 years ago When we had replaceable batteries you could just buy a new one and performance issues would be corrected almost immediately. Apple was sneaky AF about this back in the day, throttling performance in an attempt to increase battery life, something that wouldn't be needed if you could easily swap out the battery every few years permalink fedilink source parent
[–] AnonymousLlama@kbin.social 4 points 3 years ago When we had replaceable batteries you could just buy a new one and performance issues would be corrected almost immediately. Apple was sneaky AF about this back in the day, throttling performance in an attempt to increase battery life, something that wouldn't be needed if you could easily swap out the battery every few years permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Teal@lemmy.world 5 points 3 years ago That wouldn't be necessary. I had a metal phone with a replaceable battery (Motorola SLVR L7). It was more common for a cellphone to be made of plastic in the replaceable battery days because most phones were still far more utilitarian and thought of for talking, text messages, email if you had a data plan and of course Snake. Lightweight and small was popular before large screens and smart features came along. One exception was the push-to-talk phones geared towards construction workers. Those suckers were chunky. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Pons_Aelius@kbin.social 3 points 3 years ago Counterpoint: I've never owned a smartphone without a removable battery as I see it as a requirement. This is encouraging news for me. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] AnonymousLlama@kbin.social 1 point 3 years ago* I remember using the Samsung Galaxy S2 which is ancient by today's standards, but one thing I remember distinctly was how super convenient it was to be able to pull the back off and switch out the battery, it reminded me of the simplicity of swapping batteries on a DSLR camera. Some people mentioned that you'll drop your phone and the battery will just fly out. I don't remember ever having that happen and my S2 had a rough life. The one part I feel is valid criticism is water resistance, manufacturers will have to actually work on their designs to get IP resistance now. As much as I love waterproof phones, I'd much rather be able to have a spare battery than think about what happens if I drop it in water permalink fedilink source parent