▲ 1723 ▼ It's official: Smartphones will need to have replaceable batteries by 2027 (www.androidauthority.com) submitted 3 years ago by L4s@lemmy.world [M, B] to c/technology@lemmy.world 267 comments fedilink hide all child comments Do you miss phones with replaceable batteries? By 2027, you won't anymore because, by law, almost every smartphone will have them again.
[–] 0Xero0@lemmy.world 17 points 3 years ago (1 child) but only the EU though, everywhere else is still fucked permalink fedilink source hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Zeron@lemmy.world 38 points 3 years ago (2 children) Chances are most companies aren't going to make two separate production lines with and without a removable battery. The cost likely outweighs the profit i'd wager. Much like how we see apple finally begrudgingly moving to USB-C despite no NA law requiring them to do so. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Aux@lemmy.world 4 points 3 years ago (1 child) Why not? Many companies already have US exclusive SKUs. Some companies like Samsung even have a history of shipping completely different SOCs. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SeatBeeSate@lemmy.one 8 points 3 years ago (1 child) A different chip is a different scenario. We're talking about how the entire design, case etc has to accommodate for a removable battery. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Aux@lemmy.world 2 points 3 years ago Different SOC means different motherboard, different antenna layout, different everything. It's no different from making battery removable. permalink fedilink source parent [–] 0Xero0@lemmy.world 2 points 3 years ago (3 children) I hope so too. But if somehow the cost to manufacture phones with removable batteries is higher then I doubt they'd switch the existing production line to removable battery. I hope I'm wrong, to be honest. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] littlecolt@lemm.ee 7 points 3 years ago This is what happens in the US when California passes a big consumer friendly law. The companies just adapt to whatever California said because it's too expensive to have California versions and non-California versions. California's population is high and their economy is big. Double plus if NY is in on it. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Nalivai@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 3 years ago The cost isn't that much higher. The profit they get from people buying new phone when battery dies, however, is completely different story permalink fedilink source parent [–] straF@lemmy.world 2 points 3 years ago There’s just going to be more plastic phones. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Zeron@lemmy.world 38 points 3 years ago (2 children) Chances are most companies aren't going to make two separate production lines with and without a removable battery. The cost likely outweighs the profit i'd wager. Much like how we see apple finally begrudgingly moving to USB-C despite no NA law requiring them to do so. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Aux@lemmy.world 4 points 3 years ago (1 child) Why not? Many companies already have US exclusive SKUs. Some companies like Samsung even have a history of shipping completely different SOCs. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SeatBeeSate@lemmy.one 8 points 3 years ago (1 child) A different chip is a different scenario. We're talking about how the entire design, case etc has to accommodate for a removable battery. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Aux@lemmy.world 2 points 3 years ago Different SOC means different motherboard, different antenna layout, different everything. It's no different from making battery removable. permalink fedilink source parent [–] 0Xero0@lemmy.world 2 points 3 years ago (3 children) I hope so too. But if somehow the cost to manufacture phones with removable batteries is higher then I doubt they'd switch the existing production line to removable battery. I hope I'm wrong, to be honest. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] littlecolt@lemm.ee 7 points 3 years ago This is what happens in the US when California passes a big consumer friendly law. The companies just adapt to whatever California said because it's too expensive to have California versions and non-California versions. California's population is high and their economy is big. Double plus if NY is in on it. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Nalivai@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 3 years ago The cost isn't that much higher. The profit they get from people buying new phone when battery dies, however, is completely different story permalink fedilink source parent [–] straF@lemmy.world 2 points 3 years ago There’s just going to be more plastic phones. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Aux@lemmy.world 4 points 3 years ago (1 child) Why not? Many companies already have US exclusive SKUs. Some companies like Samsung even have a history of shipping completely different SOCs. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SeatBeeSate@lemmy.one 8 points 3 years ago (1 child) A different chip is a different scenario. We're talking about how the entire design, case etc has to accommodate for a removable battery. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Aux@lemmy.world 2 points 3 years ago Different SOC means different motherboard, different antenna layout, different everything. It's no different from making battery removable. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SeatBeeSate@lemmy.one 8 points 3 years ago (1 child) A different chip is a different scenario. We're talking about how the entire design, case etc has to accommodate for a removable battery. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Aux@lemmy.world 2 points 3 years ago Different SOC means different motherboard, different antenna layout, different everything. It's no different from making battery removable. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Aux@lemmy.world 2 points 3 years ago Different SOC means different motherboard, different antenna layout, different everything. It's no different from making battery removable. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] 0Xero0@lemmy.world 2 points 3 years ago (3 children) I hope so too. But if somehow the cost to manufacture phones with removable batteries is higher then I doubt they'd switch the existing production line to removable battery. I hope I'm wrong, to be honest. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] littlecolt@lemm.ee 7 points 3 years ago This is what happens in the US when California passes a big consumer friendly law. The companies just adapt to whatever California said because it's too expensive to have California versions and non-California versions. California's population is high and their economy is big. Double plus if NY is in on it. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Nalivai@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 3 years ago The cost isn't that much higher. The profit they get from people buying new phone when battery dies, however, is completely different story permalink fedilink source parent [–] straF@lemmy.world 2 points 3 years ago There’s just going to be more plastic phones. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] littlecolt@lemm.ee 7 points 3 years ago This is what happens in the US when California passes a big consumer friendly law. The companies just adapt to whatever California said because it's too expensive to have California versions and non-California versions. California's population is high and their economy is big. Double plus if NY is in on it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Nalivai@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 3 years ago The cost isn't that much higher. The profit they get from people buying new phone when battery dies, however, is completely different story permalink fedilink source parent
[–] straF@lemmy.world 2 points 3 years ago There’s just going to be more plastic phones. permalink fedilink source parent