-5
"Pathfinder has more classes than D&D" - Here's 3.5 class options. (ttrpg.network)
submitted 2 years ago by to c/rpgmemes@ttrpg.network
14 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

You clearly haven't tried 3.5e, IMHO best edition. Class for every occasion. 362 to be exact, however I might be missing some (ex. savage species monster class progression). And you can obviously mix and match classes as long as you meet the requirements.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [S] 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

Can you point me to a list of pf1e classes, since you claim it has more classes.. at least d20pfsrd.com or nethys doesn't list them all(?). I just assumed you were counting archetypes.

I found 44 base classes & 119 prestige classes in Pathfinder.

3.5 has 84 base classes & rest of 362 are prestige (also, tbh, epic classes can be argued that they don't count, which is fair).

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    I think they're making the claim that if we're looking at "varience", variety, etc. then pf1e has more overall variability. Pathfinder does it with a combination of classes and archetypes, where 3.5e does it with just classes. I don't think they made the explicit claim of there being more classes in pf1e by overall number.

    I find that instead of pathfinder having more "classes" by number, it feels more honest about what is a class and what is a subclass/archetype. Imo, many 3.5e classes would be archetypes in pathfinder, as they fit your definition of "instead of x, you get y" without much substantial difference. And likewise, in my experience playing different archetypes in pf can produce vastly different player experiences (some archetypes and classes more than others, for sure).

    All of this is pretty subjective, though... and I personally haven't heard anyone making fun of 3.5e for lacking classes, compared to either pf1e or 2e, but it could happen!

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] [S] 2 points 2 years ago*

    PF1.0 does in fact have more classes, archetypes, and prestige classes than base 3.5e.

    3rd sentence, first message.

    many 3.5e classes would be archetypes in pathfinder

    True, there are few, I wouldn't say "many" tho.

    in my experience playing different archetypes in pf can produce vastly different player experiences

    Absolutely they do and I mean, I do like PF1 as well.

    I only have a problem with "PF1 has more classes than 3.5", which I would classify as "debatable". I wouldn't say wrong, since some archetypes do change the class enough, to be in my view as well, another class.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent