โฒ 78 โผ Reddit to pay moderators and creators?? (lemmyunchained.net) submitted 3 years ago by LachlanUnchained@lemmyunchained.net to c/lemmyworld@lemmy.world 71 comments fedilink hide all child comments Has there been any indication that reddit may pay creators and moderators, like youtube and meta and other platforms do? or are they just expecting to pocket all the cash?
[โ] RedMarsRepublic@lemmy.world -1 points 3 years ago (1 child) In what universe is paying people for something they are willing to do for a free a sustainable business model? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [โ] LachlanUnchained@lemmyunchained.net [S] 4 points 3 years ago (1 child) The meta and YouTube universe. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [โ] RedMarsRepublic@lemmy.world -1 points 3 years ago* (1 child) Youtube has advertisers on individual videos which requires more moderation than endless text posts. Or to put it another way; video advertisers ask for a lot more than just crappy spam reddit post ads. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [โ] Tangent@lemmy.world 3 points 3 years ago (1 child) That's probably why YouTube has such a hair trigger on demonetizing, removing, and copyright striking videos. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [โ] RedMarsRepublic@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago Yes, and also video/audio content is much more ripe for copyright claims than image/text content, since it's all owned by giant corporations. For example the music version of all the art bots now was only trained on royalty free/copyright free music... I wonder why. permalink fedilink source parent
[โ] LachlanUnchained@lemmyunchained.net [S] 4 points 3 years ago (1 child) The meta and YouTube universe. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [โ] RedMarsRepublic@lemmy.world -1 points 3 years ago* (1 child) Youtube has advertisers on individual videos which requires more moderation than endless text posts. Or to put it another way; video advertisers ask for a lot more than just crappy spam reddit post ads. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [โ] Tangent@lemmy.world 3 points 3 years ago (1 child) That's probably why YouTube has such a hair trigger on demonetizing, removing, and copyright striking videos. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [โ] RedMarsRepublic@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago Yes, and also video/audio content is much more ripe for copyright claims than image/text content, since it's all owned by giant corporations. For example the music version of all the art bots now was only trained on royalty free/copyright free music... I wonder why. permalink fedilink source parent
[โ] RedMarsRepublic@lemmy.world -1 points 3 years ago* (1 child) Youtube has advertisers on individual videos which requires more moderation than endless text posts. Or to put it another way; video advertisers ask for a lot more than just crappy spam reddit post ads. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [โ] Tangent@lemmy.world 3 points 3 years ago (1 child) That's probably why YouTube has such a hair trigger on demonetizing, removing, and copyright striking videos. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [โ] RedMarsRepublic@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago Yes, and also video/audio content is much more ripe for copyright claims than image/text content, since it's all owned by giant corporations. For example the music version of all the art bots now was only trained on royalty free/copyright free music... I wonder why. permalink fedilink source parent
[โ] Tangent@lemmy.world 3 points 3 years ago (1 child) That's probably why YouTube has such a hair trigger on demonetizing, removing, and copyright striking videos. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [โ] RedMarsRepublic@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago Yes, and also video/audio content is much more ripe for copyright claims than image/text content, since it's all owned by giant corporations. For example the music version of all the art bots now was only trained on royalty free/copyright free music... I wonder why. permalink fedilink source parent
[โ] RedMarsRepublic@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago Yes, and also video/audio content is much more ripe for copyright claims than image/text content, since it's all owned by giant corporations. For example the music version of all the art bots now was only trained on royalty free/copyright free music... I wonder why. permalink fedilink source parent
