▲ 699 ▼ Own a Roku TV or streaming device? You're about to see a lot more ads on your home screen (www.techradar.com) submitted 2 years ago by AnActOfCreation@programming.dev to c/technology@lemmy.world 270 comments fedilink hide all child comments Ugh. Roku was one of the platforms with fewer ads. Roku will be adding more ads to the home screens of its devices and TVs in the near future. The ads will be interactive and 'shoppable' and will cover a range of industries, including restaurants and cars. Roku already has a significant amount of ads on its home screen, and it is unclear if users will be able to change their preferences for the new ads.
[–] stinerman@midwest.social 15 points 2 years ago (8 children) DNS blocking at the router never fails. permalink fedilink source hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] Ebby@lemmy.ssba.com 23 points 2 years ago* (5 children) Rumor has it Roku hard coded Google DNS nameservers on some devices so along with pihole, you have to block direct access now. FYI I had a pihole that worked until an update. Had to block Google nameservers to restore blocking. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] ThePantser@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago Similar to what Google does with some Chromebook devices. They don't respect router DNS settings. So if I wanted to block YouTube on my kids machines I had to create a black hole on my router to send all requests from 8.8.8.8 and then and only then would the Chromebook use my adguard DNS. permalink fedilink source parent [+] indigomirage@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] deweydecibel@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* They could even run under their own VPN and hook up the ads on their side... Ugh... I've always wondered why Google doesn't provide that to its ad clients. Companies send their traffic to Google, Google puts the ads in, mixes it all up in one pot, sends it to the user in a way DNS filtering can't block without also blocking the content. permalink fedilink source parent [–] RedstoneValley@sh.itjust.works -2 points 2 years ago At that point we're at their mercy. Or maybe at that point you'll begin to realize that you might not need all of this stuff, and that happyness comes from other sources. But that is just my personal approach, by all means do whatever you like. permalink fedilink source parent [–] stinerman@midwest.social 1 point 2 years ago Interesting. So far so good for me. permalink fedilink source parent [–] smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 2 years ago Until they put everything onto the same domain permalink fedilink source parent [–] Wooki@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago Linux and Finish jelly is the way permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Ebby@lemmy.ssba.com 23 points 2 years ago* (5 children) Rumor has it Roku hard coded Google DNS nameservers on some devices so along with pihole, you have to block direct access now. FYI I had a pihole that worked until an update. Had to block Google nameservers to restore blocking. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] ThePantser@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago Similar to what Google does with some Chromebook devices. They don't respect router DNS settings. So if I wanted to block YouTube on my kids machines I had to create a black hole on my router to send all requests from 8.8.8.8 and then and only then would the Chromebook use my adguard DNS. permalink fedilink source parent [+] indigomirage@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] deweydecibel@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* They could even run under their own VPN and hook up the ads on their side... Ugh... I've always wondered why Google doesn't provide that to its ad clients. Companies send their traffic to Google, Google puts the ads in, mixes it all up in one pot, sends it to the user in a way DNS filtering can't block without also blocking the content. permalink fedilink source parent [–] RedstoneValley@sh.itjust.works -2 points 2 years ago At that point we're at their mercy. Or maybe at that point you'll begin to realize that you might not need all of this stuff, and that happyness comes from other sources. But that is just my personal approach, by all means do whatever you like. permalink fedilink source parent [–] stinerman@midwest.social 1 point 2 years ago Interesting. So far so good for me. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ThePantser@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago Similar to what Google does with some Chromebook devices. They don't respect router DNS settings. So if I wanted to block YouTube on my kids machines I had to create a black hole on my router to send all requests from 8.8.8.8 and then and only then would the Chromebook use my adguard DNS. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] indigomirage@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] deweydecibel@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* They could even run under their own VPN and hook up the ads on their side... Ugh... I've always wondered why Google doesn't provide that to its ad clients. Companies send their traffic to Google, Google puts the ads in, mixes it all up in one pot, sends it to the user in a way DNS filtering can't block without also blocking the content. permalink fedilink source parent [–] RedstoneValley@sh.itjust.works -2 points 2 years ago At that point we're at their mercy. Or maybe at that point you'll begin to realize that you might not need all of this stuff, and that happyness comes from other sources. But that is just my personal approach, by all means do whatever you like. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] deweydecibel@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* They could even run under their own VPN and hook up the ads on their side... Ugh... I've always wondered why Google doesn't provide that to its ad clients. Companies send their traffic to Google, Google puts the ads in, mixes it all up in one pot, sends it to the user in a way DNS filtering can't block without also blocking the content. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] RedstoneValley@sh.itjust.works -2 points 2 years ago At that point we're at their mercy. Or maybe at that point you'll begin to realize that you might not need all of this stuff, and that happyness comes from other sources. But that is just my personal approach, by all means do whatever you like. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] stinerman@midwest.social 1 point 2 years ago Interesting. So far so good for me. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 2 years ago Until they put everything onto the same domain permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Wooki@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago Linux and Finish jelly is the way permalink fedilink source parent