Hello,

I was wondering how this rule is enforced.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] -1 points 3 years ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (5 children)
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (4 children)

    What do you think I'm redefining? The right always points to Marxism for its example of socialism. Marxism and socialism are VERY different. Is Sweden a Marxist society? Norway? Finland? Canada?

    socialism, social and economic doctrine that calls for public rather than private ownership or control of property and natural resources. According to the socialist view, individuals do not live or work in isolation but live in cooperation with one another. Furthermore, everything that people produce is in some sense a social product, and everyone who contributes to the production of a good is entitled to a share in it.

    I don't know about you but I believe that everyone SHOULD be entitled to a share of what they produced. Taking what they produce and giving it to an oligarch who gives them a pittance in return sounds very much like theft to me.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] -1 points 3 years ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (3 children)
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago* (2 children)

    Why are you so upset? You seem to be the only person here hurling insults. Perhaps you need to do a bit of self-reflection.

    Maybe start here. The only person trying to redefine socialism is you. You're using the One True Scotsman fallacy to try to define all socialism at Marxism which is disingenuous.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments