▲ 642 ▼ Elon Musk's X claims it's now a 'video-first platform' as it tries to reverse an advertiser exodus that has cost it billions in value (fortune.com) submitted 2 years ago by stopthatgirl7@kbin.social to c/technology@lemmy.world 287 comments fedilink hide all child comments The claim is a major departure for the service, which has long been known as a destination for posting short snippets of text.
[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) Right but you also seem confused about what sarcasm is. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] platypus_plumba@lemmy.world -2 points 2 years ago (2 children) I know, I said sarcasm is hard, didn't I? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] decisivelyhoodnoises@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago You mean it is hard for you to execute it? permalink fedilink source parent [–] ripcord@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) That also doesn't make much sense as a reply. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] platypus_plumba@lemmy.world -3 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Man, get those neurons checked. If you think the initial comment wasn't sarcasm, you need. to go and read the definition. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ripcord@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) It absolutely wasn't "sarcasm". permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] platypus_plumba@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (1 child) OK, maybe it wasn't sarcasm in the traditional sense, but it was clearly not something pro-Musk, which is why most dumbasses are downvoting. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ripcord@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) No, it wasn't sarcasm in any sense. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] platypus_plumba@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I like how you completely ignored the other aspect of what I said. It says a lot about who you are and how you debate. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ripcord@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago I didn't care about the other aspect you were trying to steer to. But also no, the downvotes we're because the comment was stupid. Then you tried to lie about "sarcasm" and how other people were too stupid to get it, which got you a bunch more. I don't really care about the personal attacks you're trying to make. But blocking you, since you seem like a child lashing out when called out, and it's worthless. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] platypus_plumba@lemmy.world -2 points 2 years ago (2 children) I know, I said sarcasm is hard, didn't I? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] decisivelyhoodnoises@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago You mean it is hard for you to execute it? permalink fedilink source parent [–] ripcord@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) That also doesn't make much sense as a reply. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] platypus_plumba@lemmy.world -3 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Man, get those neurons checked. If you think the initial comment wasn't sarcasm, you need. to go and read the definition. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ripcord@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) It absolutely wasn't "sarcasm". permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] platypus_plumba@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (1 child) OK, maybe it wasn't sarcasm in the traditional sense, but it was clearly not something pro-Musk, which is why most dumbasses are downvoting. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ripcord@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) No, it wasn't sarcasm in any sense. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] platypus_plumba@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I like how you completely ignored the other aspect of what I said. It says a lot about who you are and how you debate. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ripcord@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago I didn't care about the other aspect you were trying to steer to. But also no, the downvotes we're because the comment was stupid. Then you tried to lie about "sarcasm" and how other people were too stupid to get it, which got you a bunch more. I don't really care about the personal attacks you're trying to make. But blocking you, since you seem like a child lashing out when called out, and it's worthless. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] decisivelyhoodnoises@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago You mean it is hard for you to execute it? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) That also doesn't make much sense as a reply. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] platypus_plumba@lemmy.world -3 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Man, get those neurons checked. If you think the initial comment wasn't sarcasm, you need. to go and read the definition. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ripcord@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) It absolutely wasn't "sarcasm". permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] platypus_plumba@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (1 child) OK, maybe it wasn't sarcasm in the traditional sense, but it was clearly not something pro-Musk, which is why most dumbasses are downvoting. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ripcord@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) No, it wasn't sarcasm in any sense. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] platypus_plumba@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I like how you completely ignored the other aspect of what I said. It says a lot about who you are and how you debate. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ripcord@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago I didn't care about the other aspect you were trying to steer to. But also no, the downvotes we're because the comment was stupid. Then you tried to lie about "sarcasm" and how other people were too stupid to get it, which got you a bunch more. I don't really care about the personal attacks you're trying to make. But blocking you, since you seem like a child lashing out when called out, and it's worthless. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] platypus_plumba@lemmy.world -3 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Man, get those neurons checked. If you think the initial comment wasn't sarcasm, you need. to go and read the definition. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ripcord@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) It absolutely wasn't "sarcasm". permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] platypus_plumba@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (1 child) OK, maybe it wasn't sarcasm in the traditional sense, but it was clearly not something pro-Musk, which is why most dumbasses are downvoting. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ripcord@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) No, it wasn't sarcasm in any sense. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] platypus_plumba@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I like how you completely ignored the other aspect of what I said. It says a lot about who you are and how you debate. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ripcord@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago I didn't care about the other aspect you were trying to steer to. But also no, the downvotes we're because the comment was stupid. Then you tried to lie about "sarcasm" and how other people were too stupid to get it, which got you a bunch more. I don't really care about the personal attacks you're trying to make. But blocking you, since you seem like a child lashing out when called out, and it's worthless. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) It absolutely wasn't "sarcasm". permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] platypus_plumba@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (1 child) OK, maybe it wasn't sarcasm in the traditional sense, but it was clearly not something pro-Musk, which is why most dumbasses are downvoting. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ripcord@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) No, it wasn't sarcasm in any sense. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] platypus_plumba@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I like how you completely ignored the other aspect of what I said. It says a lot about who you are and how you debate. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ripcord@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago I didn't care about the other aspect you were trying to steer to. But also no, the downvotes we're because the comment was stupid. Then you tried to lie about "sarcasm" and how other people were too stupid to get it, which got you a bunch more. I don't really care about the personal attacks you're trying to make. But blocking you, since you seem like a child lashing out when called out, and it's worthless. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] platypus_plumba@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (1 child) OK, maybe it wasn't sarcasm in the traditional sense, but it was clearly not something pro-Musk, which is why most dumbasses are downvoting. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ripcord@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) No, it wasn't sarcasm in any sense. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] platypus_plumba@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I like how you completely ignored the other aspect of what I said. It says a lot about who you are and how you debate. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ripcord@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago I didn't care about the other aspect you were trying to steer to. But also no, the downvotes we're because the comment was stupid. Then you tried to lie about "sarcasm" and how other people were too stupid to get it, which got you a bunch more. I don't really care about the personal attacks you're trying to make. But blocking you, since you seem like a child lashing out when called out, and it's worthless. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) No, it wasn't sarcasm in any sense. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] platypus_plumba@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I like how you completely ignored the other aspect of what I said. It says a lot about who you are and how you debate. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ripcord@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago I didn't care about the other aspect you were trying to steer to. But also no, the downvotes we're because the comment was stupid. Then you tried to lie about "sarcasm" and how other people were too stupid to get it, which got you a bunch more. I don't really care about the personal attacks you're trying to make. But blocking you, since you seem like a child lashing out when called out, and it's worthless. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] platypus_plumba@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I like how you completely ignored the other aspect of what I said. It says a lot about who you are and how you debate. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ripcord@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago I didn't care about the other aspect you were trying to steer to. But also no, the downvotes we're because the comment was stupid. Then you tried to lie about "sarcasm" and how other people were too stupid to get it, which got you a bunch more. I don't really care about the personal attacks you're trying to make. But blocking you, since you seem like a child lashing out when called out, and it's worthless. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago I didn't care about the other aspect you were trying to steer to. But also no, the downvotes we're because the comment was stupid. Then you tried to lie about "sarcasm" and how other people were too stupid to get it, which got you a bunch more. I don't really care about the personal attacks you're trying to make. But blocking you, since you seem like a child lashing out when called out, and it's worthless. permalink fedilink source parent