▲ 147 ▼ CBC says killing of Palestinians doesn’t merit terms ‘murderous,’ ‘brutal’ ⋆ The Breach (breachmedia.ca) submitted 2 years ago by CaractacusPotts@lemmy.ca to c/canada@lemmy.ca 40 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] blunderworld@lemmy.ca 35 points 2 years ago (1 child) Well, they're wrong permalink fedilink source hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca -33 points 2 years ago (3 children) They're not. Murder has a specific definition, what's happening in gaza is not it. Brutal, maybe, but it's a useless word and the editorial guidelines likely provide different words that are more applicable in a reporting context. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 31 points 2 years ago (1 child) Murder does have a specific definition, you are correct in that. What's happening in Gaza meets that definition, so you are wrong in that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca -29 points 2 years ago (2 children) No it doesn't, the government of Israel is giving the orders, and therefore it's not murder. Governments can't murder, there are other words that describe when a government kills people. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca 24 points 2 years ago (1 child) governments can't murder Funniest shit I read today, thank you permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca -2 points 2 years ago (1 child) You can't read full sentences clearly. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) Do you prefer the term "war crime"? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago CBC has used other words, including war crime. That's kinda the point. They have specific journalistic ways of describing things in many different contexts. https://cbc.radio-canada.ca/en/vision/governance/journalistic-standards-and-practices permalink fedilink source parent [–] ttmrichter@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago (1 child) I quoted the dictionary definition of murder above. Can you point to the part that says governments can't murder? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] I_Has_A_Hat@startrek.website -4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 years ago You are correct, but technically, the killing of civilians during warfare is called "a war crime". permalink fedilink source parent [+] ttmrichter@lemmy.world -2 points 2 years ago* (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] blunderworld@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 years ago I don't even disagree with you, but you're not helping your argument by throwing a tantrum. If you can't communicate your point without resorting to name calling, you should probably just say nothing. permalink fedilink source parent [–] anachronist@midwest.social 27 points 2 years ago (1 child) Soldiers sniping obviously innocent people (including women going to church, and hostages trying to escape in their underwear waving white flags) is definitely murder. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca -25 points 2 years ago (2 children) If a solider is operating on orders when killing civilians, it's legally not murder. It's still bad, but they will not charged by the government with murder because it was authorized by the government. That's what I'm saying here. There are legal definitions for these words that matter. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Nikelui@kbin.social 23 points 2 years ago (1 child) Ah, so it's war crimes. I was worried there for a bit. /s permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] I_Has_A_Hat@startrek.website -4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] blunderworld@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 years ago (2 children) You know what else may be considered small brain thinking? Acting so pedantic over insignificant details like these, all while real people continue to die every day. The end result is the same: a mass slaughter of innocents. But that's just my opinion. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] ttmrichter@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago You know what else is small brain thinking? INCORRECTLY being pedantic about word choices. That's the part that pisses me off the most with these apologists. They are literally incorrecting people using words properly. permalink fedilink source parent [+] I_Has_A_Hat@startrek.website -3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] blunderworld@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 years ago What about this discussion do you think is intended to make anyone feel better? permalink fedilink source parent [–] ttmrichter@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago I cited the definitions of "murder" above. Explain to me, with reference to these definitions, how the term "murder" doesn't apply. (Hint: this is not possible.) permalink fedilink source parent [+] ttmrichter@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent [+] ttmrichter@lemmy.world 22 points 2 years ago* [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent
[+] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca -33 points 2 years ago (3 children) They're not. Murder has a specific definition, what's happening in gaza is not it. Brutal, maybe, but it's a useless word and the editorial guidelines likely provide different words that are more applicable in a reporting context. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 31 points 2 years ago (1 child) Murder does have a specific definition, you are correct in that. What's happening in Gaza meets that definition, so you are wrong in that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca -29 points 2 years ago (2 children) No it doesn't, the government of Israel is giving the orders, and therefore it's not murder. Governments can't murder, there are other words that describe when a government kills people. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca 24 points 2 years ago (1 child) governments can't murder Funniest shit I read today, thank you permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca -2 points 2 years ago (1 child) You can't read full sentences clearly. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) Do you prefer the term "war crime"? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago CBC has used other words, including war crime. That's kinda the point. They have specific journalistic ways of describing things in many different contexts. https://cbc.radio-canada.ca/en/vision/governance/journalistic-standards-and-practices permalink fedilink source parent [–] ttmrichter@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago (1 child) I quoted the dictionary definition of murder above. Can you point to the part that says governments can't murder? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] I_Has_A_Hat@startrek.website -4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 years ago You are correct, but technically, the killing of civilians during warfare is called "a war crime". permalink fedilink source parent [+] ttmrichter@lemmy.world -2 points 2 years ago* (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] blunderworld@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 years ago I don't even disagree with you, but you're not helping your argument by throwing a tantrum. If you can't communicate your point without resorting to name calling, you should probably just say nothing. permalink fedilink source parent [–] anachronist@midwest.social 27 points 2 years ago (1 child) Soldiers sniping obviously innocent people (including women going to church, and hostages trying to escape in their underwear waving white flags) is definitely murder. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca -25 points 2 years ago (2 children) If a solider is operating on orders when killing civilians, it's legally not murder. It's still bad, but they will not charged by the government with murder because it was authorized by the government. That's what I'm saying here. There are legal definitions for these words that matter. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Nikelui@kbin.social 23 points 2 years ago (1 child) Ah, so it's war crimes. I was worried there for a bit. /s permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] I_Has_A_Hat@startrek.website -4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] blunderworld@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 years ago (2 children) You know what else may be considered small brain thinking? Acting so pedantic over insignificant details like these, all while real people continue to die every day. The end result is the same: a mass slaughter of innocents. But that's just my opinion. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] ttmrichter@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago You know what else is small brain thinking? INCORRECTLY being pedantic about word choices. That's the part that pisses me off the most with these apologists. They are literally incorrecting people using words properly. permalink fedilink source parent [+] I_Has_A_Hat@startrek.website -3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] blunderworld@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 years ago What about this discussion do you think is intended to make anyone feel better? permalink fedilink source parent [–] ttmrichter@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago I cited the definitions of "murder" above. Explain to me, with reference to these definitions, how the term "murder" doesn't apply. (Hint: this is not possible.) permalink fedilink source parent [+] ttmrichter@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent [+] ttmrichter@lemmy.world 22 points 2 years ago* [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 31 points 2 years ago (1 child) Murder does have a specific definition, you are correct in that. What's happening in Gaza meets that definition, so you are wrong in that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca -29 points 2 years ago (2 children) No it doesn't, the government of Israel is giving the orders, and therefore it's not murder. Governments can't murder, there are other words that describe when a government kills people. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca 24 points 2 years ago (1 child) governments can't murder Funniest shit I read today, thank you permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca -2 points 2 years ago (1 child) You can't read full sentences clearly. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) Do you prefer the term "war crime"? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago CBC has used other words, including war crime. That's kinda the point. They have specific journalistic ways of describing things in many different contexts. https://cbc.radio-canada.ca/en/vision/governance/journalistic-standards-and-practices permalink fedilink source parent [–] ttmrichter@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago (1 child) I quoted the dictionary definition of murder above. Can you point to the part that says governments can't murder? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] I_Has_A_Hat@startrek.website -4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 years ago You are correct, but technically, the killing of civilians during warfare is called "a war crime". permalink fedilink source parent [+] ttmrichter@lemmy.world -2 points 2 years ago* (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] blunderworld@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 years ago I don't even disagree with you, but you're not helping your argument by throwing a tantrum. If you can't communicate your point without resorting to name calling, you should probably just say nothing. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca -29 points 2 years ago (2 children) No it doesn't, the government of Israel is giving the orders, and therefore it's not murder. Governments can't murder, there are other words that describe when a government kills people. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca 24 points 2 years ago (1 child) governments can't murder Funniest shit I read today, thank you permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca -2 points 2 years ago (1 child) You can't read full sentences clearly. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) Do you prefer the term "war crime"? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago CBC has used other words, including war crime. That's kinda the point. They have specific journalistic ways of describing things in many different contexts. https://cbc.radio-canada.ca/en/vision/governance/journalistic-standards-and-practices permalink fedilink source parent [–] ttmrichter@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago (1 child) I quoted the dictionary definition of murder above. Can you point to the part that says governments can't murder? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] I_Has_A_Hat@startrek.website -4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 years ago You are correct, but technically, the killing of civilians during warfare is called "a war crime". permalink fedilink source parent [+] ttmrichter@lemmy.world -2 points 2 years ago* (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] blunderworld@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 years ago I don't even disagree with you, but you're not helping your argument by throwing a tantrum. If you can't communicate your point without resorting to name calling, you should probably just say nothing. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca 24 points 2 years ago (1 child) governments can't murder Funniest shit I read today, thank you permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca -2 points 2 years ago (1 child) You can't read full sentences clearly. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) Do you prefer the term "war crime"? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago CBC has used other words, including war crime. That's kinda the point. They have specific journalistic ways of describing things in many different contexts. https://cbc.radio-canada.ca/en/vision/governance/journalistic-standards-and-practices permalink fedilink source parent
[–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca -2 points 2 years ago (1 child) You can't read full sentences clearly. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) Do you prefer the term "war crime"? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago CBC has used other words, including war crime. That's kinda the point. They have specific journalistic ways of describing things in many different contexts. https://cbc.radio-canada.ca/en/vision/governance/journalistic-standards-and-practices permalink fedilink source parent
[–] isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) Do you prefer the term "war crime"? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago CBC has used other words, including war crime. That's kinda the point. They have specific journalistic ways of describing things in many different contexts. https://cbc.radio-canada.ca/en/vision/governance/journalistic-standards-and-practices permalink fedilink source parent
[–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago CBC has used other words, including war crime. That's kinda the point. They have specific journalistic ways of describing things in many different contexts. https://cbc.radio-canada.ca/en/vision/governance/journalistic-standards-and-practices permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ttmrichter@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago (1 child) I quoted the dictionary definition of murder above. Can you point to the part that says governments can't murder? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] I_Has_A_Hat@startrek.website -4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 years ago You are correct, but technically, the killing of civilians during warfare is called "a war crime". permalink fedilink source parent [+] ttmrichter@lemmy.world -2 points 2 years ago* (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] blunderworld@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 years ago I don't even disagree with you, but you're not helping your argument by throwing a tantrum. If you can't communicate your point without resorting to name calling, you should probably just say nothing. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] I_Has_A_Hat@startrek.website -4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 years ago You are correct, but technically, the killing of civilians during warfare is called "a war crime". permalink fedilink source parent [+] ttmrichter@lemmy.world -2 points 2 years ago* (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] blunderworld@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 years ago I don't even disagree with you, but you're not helping your argument by throwing a tantrum. If you can't communicate your point without resorting to name calling, you should probably just say nothing. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 years ago You are correct, but technically, the killing of civilians during warfare is called "a war crime". permalink fedilink source parent
[+] ttmrichter@lemmy.world -2 points 2 years ago* (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] blunderworld@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 years ago I don't even disagree with you, but you're not helping your argument by throwing a tantrum. If you can't communicate your point without resorting to name calling, you should probably just say nothing. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] blunderworld@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 years ago I don't even disagree with you, but you're not helping your argument by throwing a tantrum. If you can't communicate your point without resorting to name calling, you should probably just say nothing. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] anachronist@midwest.social 27 points 2 years ago (1 child) Soldiers sniping obviously innocent people (including women going to church, and hostages trying to escape in their underwear waving white flags) is definitely murder. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca -25 points 2 years ago (2 children) If a solider is operating on orders when killing civilians, it's legally not murder. It's still bad, but they will not charged by the government with murder because it was authorized by the government. That's what I'm saying here. There are legal definitions for these words that matter. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Nikelui@kbin.social 23 points 2 years ago (1 child) Ah, so it's war crimes. I was worried there for a bit. /s permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] I_Has_A_Hat@startrek.website -4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] blunderworld@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 years ago (2 children) You know what else may be considered small brain thinking? Acting so pedantic over insignificant details like these, all while real people continue to die every day. The end result is the same: a mass slaughter of innocents. But that's just my opinion. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] ttmrichter@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago You know what else is small brain thinking? INCORRECTLY being pedantic about word choices. That's the part that pisses me off the most with these apologists. They are literally incorrecting people using words properly. permalink fedilink source parent [+] I_Has_A_Hat@startrek.website -3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] blunderworld@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 years ago What about this discussion do you think is intended to make anyone feel better? permalink fedilink source parent [–] ttmrichter@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago I cited the definitions of "murder" above. Explain to me, with reference to these definitions, how the term "murder" doesn't apply. (Hint: this is not possible.) permalink fedilink source parent [+] ttmrichter@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent
[+] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca -25 points 2 years ago (2 children) If a solider is operating on orders when killing civilians, it's legally not murder. It's still bad, but they will not charged by the government with murder because it was authorized by the government. That's what I'm saying here. There are legal definitions for these words that matter. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Nikelui@kbin.social 23 points 2 years ago (1 child) Ah, so it's war crimes. I was worried there for a bit. /s permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] I_Has_A_Hat@startrek.website -4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] blunderworld@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 years ago (2 children) You know what else may be considered small brain thinking? Acting so pedantic over insignificant details like these, all while real people continue to die every day. The end result is the same: a mass slaughter of innocents. But that's just my opinion. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] ttmrichter@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago You know what else is small brain thinking? INCORRECTLY being pedantic about word choices. That's the part that pisses me off the most with these apologists. They are literally incorrecting people using words properly. permalink fedilink source parent [+] I_Has_A_Hat@startrek.website -3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] blunderworld@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 years ago What about this discussion do you think is intended to make anyone feel better? permalink fedilink source parent [–] ttmrichter@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago I cited the definitions of "murder" above. Explain to me, with reference to these definitions, how the term "murder" doesn't apply. (Hint: this is not possible.) permalink fedilink source parent [+] ttmrichter@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Nikelui@kbin.social 23 points 2 years ago (1 child) Ah, so it's war crimes. I was worried there for a bit. /s permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] I_Has_A_Hat@startrek.website -4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] blunderworld@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 years ago (2 children) You know what else may be considered small brain thinking? Acting so pedantic over insignificant details like these, all while real people continue to die every day. The end result is the same: a mass slaughter of innocents. But that's just my opinion. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] ttmrichter@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago You know what else is small brain thinking? INCORRECTLY being pedantic about word choices. That's the part that pisses me off the most with these apologists. They are literally incorrecting people using words properly. permalink fedilink source parent [+] I_Has_A_Hat@startrek.website -3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] blunderworld@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 years ago What about this discussion do you think is intended to make anyone feel better? permalink fedilink source parent [–] ttmrichter@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago I cited the definitions of "murder" above. Explain to me, with reference to these definitions, how the term "murder" doesn't apply. (Hint: this is not possible.) permalink fedilink source parent
[+] I_Has_A_Hat@startrek.website -4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] blunderworld@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 years ago (2 children) You know what else may be considered small brain thinking? Acting so pedantic over insignificant details like these, all while real people continue to die every day. The end result is the same: a mass slaughter of innocents. But that's just my opinion. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] ttmrichter@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago You know what else is small brain thinking? INCORRECTLY being pedantic about word choices. That's the part that pisses me off the most with these apologists. They are literally incorrecting people using words properly. permalink fedilink source parent [+] I_Has_A_Hat@startrek.website -3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] blunderworld@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 years ago What about this discussion do you think is intended to make anyone feel better? permalink fedilink source parent [–] ttmrichter@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago I cited the definitions of "murder" above. Explain to me, with reference to these definitions, how the term "murder" doesn't apply. (Hint: this is not possible.) permalink fedilink source parent
[–] blunderworld@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 years ago (2 children) You know what else may be considered small brain thinking? Acting so pedantic over insignificant details like these, all while real people continue to die every day. The end result is the same: a mass slaughter of innocents. But that's just my opinion. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] ttmrichter@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago You know what else is small brain thinking? INCORRECTLY being pedantic about word choices. That's the part that pisses me off the most with these apologists. They are literally incorrecting people using words properly. permalink fedilink source parent [+] I_Has_A_Hat@startrek.website -3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] blunderworld@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 years ago What about this discussion do you think is intended to make anyone feel better? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ttmrichter@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago You know what else is small brain thinking? INCORRECTLY being pedantic about word choices. That's the part that pisses me off the most with these apologists. They are literally incorrecting people using words properly. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] I_Has_A_Hat@startrek.website -3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] blunderworld@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 years ago What about this discussion do you think is intended to make anyone feel better? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] blunderworld@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 years ago What about this discussion do you think is intended to make anyone feel better? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ttmrichter@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago I cited the definitions of "murder" above. Explain to me, with reference to these definitions, how the term "murder" doesn't apply. (Hint: this is not possible.) permalink fedilink source parent