-37
'We have no rights.' Frustrated with California wage laws, Moonstone Bistro cuts lunch service | KRCR (krcrtv.com)
submitted 2 years ago by to c/conservative@lemm.ee
15 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 8 points 2 years ago (17 children)

If you'd rather lose business than pay a living wage then it's not a policy issue, it's a management issue.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 17 child comments
    •
  • [+] [S] -10 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (16 children)
    [deleted]
  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
    •
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago (15 children)

    Yes it is

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
    •
  • [+] [S] -10 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (14 children)
    [deleted]
  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
    •
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago (13 children)

    The owners work is being undervalued?! lol

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
    •
  • [+] [S] -12 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (12 children)
    [deleted]
  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
    •
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (11 children)

    I read it. Just because the owners feel it doesn't make it true.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
    •
  • [+] [S] -12 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (10 children)
    [deleted]
  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (9 children)

    It's not that risky to run a business. If it fails then you're insulated from its failure.

    If your business can't succeed without your employees being impoverished then it's not a business that deserves to exist.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
    •
  • [+] [S] -8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (8 children)
    [deleted]
  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
    •
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago (7 children)

    Assuming that you don't already have the capital from other means.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
    •
  • [+] [S] -8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (6 children)
    [deleted]
  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    So they're employees should be poor because the owners want more profits?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [+] [S] -7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children)
    [deleted]
  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Because they don't want to pay a living wage to their employees yet they want all of the profits from the business.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [+] [S] -6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)
    [deleted]
  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •