Hope this isn't a repeated submission. Funny how they're trying to deflect blame after they tried to change the EULA post breach.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 0 points 2 years ago*

Laughing a feature that lets an inevitable attack access 500 other people's info for every comprimised account is a glaring security failure.

Accounting for foreseeable risks to users' data is the company's responsibility and they launched a feature that made a massive breach inevitable. It's not the users' fault for opting in to a feature that obviously should never have been launched.

  • source
  • parent