▲ 1100 ▼ Pornhub blocks North Carolina and Montana as porn regulation spreads (www.theverge.com) submitted 2 years ago by throws_lemy@lemmy.nz to c/technology@lemmy.world 400 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] cordlesslamp@lemmy.today 5 points 2 years ago (3 children) isn't that illegal on multiple counts? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] pete_the_cat@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (2 children) I don't believe so, the people at the porn shop are at a public place and anyone can take a picture of you in public. You have zero rights to privacy in public spaces (AFAIK), ya know, because they're public spaces. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] cordlesslamp@lemmy.today 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) Public harassment? Humiliation? How about using those photos with malicious purpose without consent? Sure it's must be some kind of defamation? Also, I don't think you can just following a stranger and take their pictures just because it's "public space". There must be some kind of limitations to that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] pete_the_cat@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago Did you forget about the Paparazzi? Their job is to literally follow celebrities and take pictures of them in public. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] pete_the_cat@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (2 children) I don't believe so, the people at the porn shop are at a public place and anyone can take a picture of you in public. You have zero rights to privacy in public spaces (AFAIK), ya know, because they're public spaces. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] cordlesslamp@lemmy.today 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) Public harassment? Humiliation? How about using those photos with malicious purpose without consent? Sure it's must be some kind of defamation? Also, I don't think you can just following a stranger and take their pictures just because it's "public space". There must be some kind of limitations to that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] pete_the_cat@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago Did you forget about the Paparazzi? Their job is to literally follow celebrities and take pictures of them in public. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] cordlesslamp@lemmy.today 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) Public harassment? Humiliation? How about using those photos with malicious purpose without consent? Sure it's must be some kind of defamation? Also, I don't think you can just following a stranger and take their pictures just because it's "public space". There must be some kind of limitations to that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] pete_the_cat@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago Did you forget about the Paparazzi? Their job is to literally follow celebrities and take pictures of them in public. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] pete_the_cat@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago Did you forget about the Paparazzi? Their job is to literally follow celebrities and take pictures of them in public. permalink fedilink source parent