Cybersecurity

cybersecurity@sh.itjust.works

10,556 readers

1,404 active

63 users here now

c/cybersecurity is a community centered on the cybersecurity and information security profession. You can come here to discuss news, post something interesting, or just chat with others.

THE RULES

Instance Rules

Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.
No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
No Ads / Spamming.
No pornography.

Community Rules

Idk, keep it semi-professional?
Nothing illegal. We're all ethical here.
Rules will be added/redefined as necessary.

If you ask someone to hack your "friends" socials you're just going to get banned so don't do that.

Learn about hacking

Hack the Box

Try Hack Me

Pico Capture the flag

Other security-related communities !databreaches@lemmy.zip !netsec@lemmy.world !securitynews@infosec.pub !cybersecurity@infosec.pub !pulse_of_truth@infosec.pub

Notable mention to !cybersecuritymemes@lemmy.world

founded 3 years ago

moderators

kid@sh.itjust.works

Lanky_Pomegranate530@midwest.social

23andMe tells victims it's their fault that their data was breached | TechCrunch (techcrunch.com)

submitted 2 years ago by Eezyville@sh.itjust.works to c/cybersecurity@sh.itjust.works

11 comments fedilink hide all child comments

They're blaming customers for not having good cybersecurity practices instead of themselves for not having good cybersecurity practices.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] brettvitaz@programming.dev 5 points 2 years ago

Yeah, users have some of the blame, but 23andme shares responsibility by not having basic detection of bad actors. Some things that come to mind are rate limits, alarms on strange user login behavior, watching for mass logins from an unexpected region, excessive bad password attempts across a large number of users.

permalink

fedilink

source