129
Pika Labs new generative AI video tool unveiled — and it looks like a big deal (www.tomsguide.com)
submitted 2 years ago by [M, B] to c/technology@lemmy.world
128 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Pika Labs new generative AI video tool unveiled — and it looks like a big deal::The new Pika 1.0 tool comes after a $55 million funding round for the generative AI company and is a big step up in AI video production.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 13 points 2 years ago (15 children)

Capitalism optimizes for lazy over good. Who's going to be able to pay rent as an artist in your dystopia

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (14 children)

    What artists do you know that make money off their art? The starving artist not being able to make money to survive has been a thing since before Van Gogh's time.

    We've automated the food making process, but people still make money off of preparation of food, there's always going to be a market for artists, but that market will be different.

    These AI things are great tools to assist artists, but the fear mongering gets in the way.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
    •
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago* (9 children)

    What artists do you know that make money off their art?

    this is such a bad take, I present to you, society. and the hundreds of thousands if not millions, tens or hundreds of millions of employed (either self or through businesses) artists.

    and using the "starving artist" as a goal we should transition to just really sucks in concept. I'm not sure you would say the same if it was your profession.

    I know reddit lemmy is full of techbros but geez have some compassion for other people. Oh wooweey i can type words and not have to have someone else do an art, I'm an artist now, everyone else can starve

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (8 children)

    I'm not sure you would say the same if it was your profession.

    I am an artist, who uses AI to assist me...

    I know reddit lemmy is full of techbros but geez have some compassion for other people.

    So because I don't see AI as a big scary monster coming to devour our souls I'm a Tech Bro and don't have compassion?

    But yeah, fear AI all you want, but artists will always be needed even if the bleep Boop machine can do it faster.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
    •
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    Writing prompts for an image generator doesn't make you an artist, lol

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] -3 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    Well not in the sense of the word you're using, but there is an art to getting them to do what you want if your doing more than just dumb shit like I post on this account.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    There is some technical skill involved in making it output something in the direction you want, but nothing exists until you hit enter, only a vague concept. The process is so detached from the artistic decision making that it is a complete outstrech to call it art. You can never have a personal style doing AI stuff. No vision, no nuances.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    There is some technical skill involved in pointing the camera in the direction you want, but nothing exists until you hit the shutter, only a vague concept. The process is so detached from the artistic decision making that it is a complete outstrech to call it art. You can never have a personal style doing photography. No vision, no nuances.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Yes. Photography captures an instant of the real world. The photographer still has to choose the moment, perspective, composition, filters and so on, but they are very constrained (not as much as AI prompters).

    The debate about the artistic involvement of photography has existed sonce the invention of the camera, it's not something new.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago

    The debate about the artistic involvement of photography has existed sonce the invention of the camera, it’s not something new.

    That's exactly my point, when the camera was first invented people decried it for killing art, now most people consider photography to be an art. You're doing exactly the same with generative AI.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago

    Do you mean that you were an artist who made art before AI image generation existed and you’ve incorporated it into your art, or do you mean you’re an artist because you type out what you want for the AI? Because people just paying artists to make something for them are also artists if that’s what you mean.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    No, this is a tool that does all of the work of an artist. It is absolutely not an assistant.

    That's a bad faith argument, and it's actively harmful. Artists are struggling yes, and this just makes that worse, it won't be a separate market that somehow doesn't impact them.

    If you think we should actually work to make it harder for artists to do things, that it's actually good that they struggle, then you have some messed up priorities, friend.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago

    It doesn't really do all the work of an artist though. It generates pictures, but consider that a camera also generates pictures of things, and yet photography is considered an art form these days, and one's results from doing that can vary quite a bit between someone who understands both artistic principles and how their tools function, versus someone who does not. Having an image generator does not also entail knowing what to ask the generator for, or how to make any adjustments to it's output if it gives you something that is close to what you envision but not quite there. If anything, I personally suspect a more mature version of the technology will get integrated into art tools in some way rather than looking like it currently does, because a text prompt is a somewhat vague and inexact way to describe an image. If you ask it for a spaceship, for example, it'll give you some sort of spaceship, and if you ask it for a specific spaceship from pop culture it may likely give you that, but if you're imagining a specific design for a spaceship, with specific details, that does not already exist in existing art, it would be very hard to completely describe that just through text, versus if you could start sketching out and have it sort of act as a kind of graphical autocomplete that you can steer in given directions.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    Ok so it's absolutely not an assistant right? So say I'm working on a business logo and I'm having a hard time coming up with an idea to branch off of, I use an ai image gen to create a bunch of logos in a bunch of styles, I then use a couple as starting points for a design. How is that not a tool to assist an artist?

    Just because you don't see it as a tool to assist an artist's doesn't mean it isn't, people will use any tool for good or evil.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •