you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 9 points 2 years ago (5 children)

The article doesn't do a good job of explaining the 40%, you have to infer it. But when you do, it isn't natural gas, but solar + wind + hydro + nuclear.

This is actually fantastic news. 40% renewable, 40% natural gas, and 20% coal is a huge step in the right direction.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    The article doesn't do a good job of explaining the 40%

    I thought the chart was pretty clear. Although I guess they could’ve color coded it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago

    I think color coding it would've helped a bit yeah. Especially if they used the same color for wind and hydro and solar and nuclear. Otherwise you read 40% in the headline and the first thing which draws your attention is 44% natural gas

  • source
  • parent