354
Hot take: LLM technology is being purposefully framed as AI to avoid accountability (lemmy.world)
submitted 3 years ago by to c/technology@lemmy.world
103 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Which of the following sounds more reasonable?

  • I shouldn't have to pay for the content that I use to tune my LLM model and algorithm.

  • We shouldn't have to pay for the content we use to train and teach an AI.

By calling it AI, the corporations are able to advocate for a position that's blatantly pro corporate and anti writer/artist, and trick people into supporting it under the guise of a technological development.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [S] 3 points 3 years ago

Right, where I'm coming from is that I don't think the personhood arguments you see for why content should be free for it really hold any water. Whatever the case on its intelligence, it isn't comparable to humans for copyright law

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent