▲ 127 ▼ Sarah Silverman is suing OpenAI and Meta for copyright infringement. (www.theverge.com) submitted 3 years ago by L4s@lemmy.world [M, B] to c/technology@lemmy.world 57 comments fedilink hide all child comments Sarah Silverman, Christopher Golden, and Richard Kadrey are suing OpenAI and Meta over violation of their copyrighted books. The trio says their works were pulled from illegal “shadow libraries” without their consent.
[–] BURN@lemmy.world -3 points 3 years ago (1 child) But it is partially original. With AI nothing is original. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] iegod@lemm.ee 4 points 3 years ago (1 child) No. This fundamentally misrepresents the ai models. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] BURN@lemmy.world -4 points 3 years ago (2 children) No it doesn’t. AI doesn’t generate anything new. It uses mathematical models to rearrange and regurgitate what it’s already been given. There’s no creation, there’s nothing original. It’s simply stats. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Marsupial@quokk.au 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) Like a remix? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] BURN@lemmy.world 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) Original interpretation and human input. There’s neither with AI. AI does not create anything. Period. Full stop. No question about it. It’s an objective fact that it doesn’t create anything new. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Marsupial@quokk.au 2 points 3 years ago (1 child) Ants create things. Creation isn’t some complex higher functioning organism trait. If it didn’t exist before and it does after, it was created. It doesn’t matter if it’s a mash of other content or made by a human. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] BURN@lemmy.world -2 points 3 years ago I fundamentally disagree. Creation needs some degree of originality. Otherwise it’s just a rehash of what exists already, and that’s not creation of anything new. I never said non-humans can’t create. I said AI can’t. And I stand by that. There is nothing original about anything a LLM does. It’s statistical analysis on a crazy amount of data. Not creating. permalink fedilink source parent [–] iegod@lemm.ee 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) Again, not true. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] BURN@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago It is Neural Networks and by extension LLMs are simply statistical models reorganizing training data based on statistical probability. It’s not creating anything new, it’s taking the inputs and more or less “translating” it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] iegod@lemm.ee 4 points 3 years ago (1 child) No. This fundamentally misrepresents the ai models. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] BURN@lemmy.world -4 points 3 years ago (2 children) No it doesn’t. AI doesn’t generate anything new. It uses mathematical models to rearrange and regurgitate what it’s already been given. There’s no creation, there’s nothing original. It’s simply stats. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Marsupial@quokk.au 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) Like a remix? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] BURN@lemmy.world 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) Original interpretation and human input. There’s neither with AI. AI does not create anything. Period. Full stop. No question about it. It’s an objective fact that it doesn’t create anything new. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Marsupial@quokk.au 2 points 3 years ago (1 child) Ants create things. Creation isn’t some complex higher functioning organism trait. If it didn’t exist before and it does after, it was created. It doesn’t matter if it’s a mash of other content or made by a human. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] BURN@lemmy.world -2 points 3 years ago I fundamentally disagree. Creation needs some degree of originality. Otherwise it’s just a rehash of what exists already, and that’s not creation of anything new. I never said non-humans can’t create. I said AI can’t. And I stand by that. There is nothing original about anything a LLM does. It’s statistical analysis on a crazy amount of data. Not creating. permalink fedilink source parent [–] iegod@lemm.ee 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) Again, not true. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] BURN@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago It is Neural Networks and by extension LLMs are simply statistical models reorganizing training data based on statistical probability. It’s not creating anything new, it’s taking the inputs and more or less “translating” it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] BURN@lemmy.world -4 points 3 years ago (2 children) No it doesn’t. AI doesn’t generate anything new. It uses mathematical models to rearrange and regurgitate what it’s already been given. There’s no creation, there’s nothing original. It’s simply stats. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Marsupial@quokk.au 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) Like a remix? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] BURN@lemmy.world 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) Original interpretation and human input. There’s neither with AI. AI does not create anything. Period. Full stop. No question about it. It’s an objective fact that it doesn’t create anything new. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Marsupial@quokk.au 2 points 3 years ago (1 child) Ants create things. Creation isn’t some complex higher functioning organism trait. If it didn’t exist before and it does after, it was created. It doesn’t matter if it’s a mash of other content or made by a human. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] BURN@lemmy.world -2 points 3 years ago I fundamentally disagree. Creation needs some degree of originality. Otherwise it’s just a rehash of what exists already, and that’s not creation of anything new. I never said non-humans can’t create. I said AI can’t. And I stand by that. There is nothing original about anything a LLM does. It’s statistical analysis on a crazy amount of data. Not creating. permalink fedilink source parent [–] iegod@lemm.ee 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) Again, not true. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] BURN@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago It is Neural Networks and by extension LLMs are simply statistical models reorganizing training data based on statistical probability. It’s not creating anything new, it’s taking the inputs and more or less “translating” it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Marsupial@quokk.au 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) Like a remix? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] BURN@lemmy.world 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) Original interpretation and human input. There’s neither with AI. AI does not create anything. Period. Full stop. No question about it. It’s an objective fact that it doesn’t create anything new. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Marsupial@quokk.au 2 points 3 years ago (1 child) Ants create things. Creation isn’t some complex higher functioning organism trait. If it didn’t exist before and it does after, it was created. It doesn’t matter if it’s a mash of other content or made by a human. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] BURN@lemmy.world -2 points 3 years ago I fundamentally disagree. Creation needs some degree of originality. Otherwise it’s just a rehash of what exists already, and that’s not creation of anything new. I never said non-humans can’t create. I said AI can’t. And I stand by that. There is nothing original about anything a LLM does. It’s statistical analysis on a crazy amount of data. Not creating. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] BURN@lemmy.world 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) Original interpretation and human input. There’s neither with AI. AI does not create anything. Period. Full stop. No question about it. It’s an objective fact that it doesn’t create anything new. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Marsupial@quokk.au 2 points 3 years ago (1 child) Ants create things. Creation isn’t some complex higher functioning organism trait. If it didn’t exist before and it does after, it was created. It doesn’t matter if it’s a mash of other content or made by a human. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] BURN@lemmy.world -2 points 3 years ago I fundamentally disagree. Creation needs some degree of originality. Otherwise it’s just a rehash of what exists already, and that’s not creation of anything new. I never said non-humans can’t create. I said AI can’t. And I stand by that. There is nothing original about anything a LLM does. It’s statistical analysis on a crazy amount of data. Not creating. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Marsupial@quokk.au 2 points 3 years ago (1 child) Ants create things. Creation isn’t some complex higher functioning organism trait. If it didn’t exist before and it does after, it was created. It doesn’t matter if it’s a mash of other content or made by a human. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] BURN@lemmy.world -2 points 3 years ago I fundamentally disagree. Creation needs some degree of originality. Otherwise it’s just a rehash of what exists already, and that’s not creation of anything new. I never said non-humans can’t create. I said AI can’t. And I stand by that. There is nothing original about anything a LLM does. It’s statistical analysis on a crazy amount of data. Not creating. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] BURN@lemmy.world -2 points 3 years ago I fundamentally disagree. Creation needs some degree of originality. Otherwise it’s just a rehash of what exists already, and that’s not creation of anything new. I never said non-humans can’t create. I said AI can’t. And I stand by that. There is nothing original about anything a LLM does. It’s statistical analysis on a crazy amount of data. Not creating. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] iegod@lemm.ee 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) Again, not true. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] BURN@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago It is Neural Networks and by extension LLMs are simply statistical models reorganizing training data based on statistical probability. It’s not creating anything new, it’s taking the inputs and more or less “translating” it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] BURN@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago It is Neural Networks and by extension LLMs are simply statistical models reorganizing training data based on statistical probability. It’s not creating anything new, it’s taking the inputs and more or less “translating” it. permalink fedilink source parent