980
Dear server admins, please defederate threads.net. Dear users, ask your server admin to defederate threads.net. (mstdn.social)
submitted 2 years ago by to c/fediverse@lemmy.world
825 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Meta just announced that they are trying to integrate Threads with ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, etc.). We need to defederate them if we want to avoid them pushing their crap into fediverse.

If you're a server admin, please defederate Meta's domain "threads.net"

If you don't run your own server, please ask your server admin to defederate "threads.net".

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 3 points 2 years ago (10 children)

They may be overwhelmed by visitors from Threads and then Meta pulls out and they'll all leave.

People who would register on normal instances or threads would only use Threads because of being lazy and then be lazy after Meta pulls out.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    People who would register on normal instances or threads would only use Threads because of being lazy and then be lazy after Meta pulls out.

    Isn't this already the case? I find it unlikely for someone to find Lemmy without having developed a dislike for platforms owned by big corpos.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (3 children)

    ... And then they can use it through Threads, and over time forget something and move to Threads, and then oops. Such things happen. Humans are not principle-driven nor should they be.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    I think you misunderstood me. I'm saying that whenever someone finds out about Lemmy, it's because they've already sworn off Facebook, Reddit and other big platforms.

    Do you think such a person will go back to a Facebook-owned platform just because it happens to federate?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    If they become overwhelming, admins can defed same as anywhere else. But whats the argument for doing so preemptively?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago

    I'm fairly new to the fediverse, but I see it this way. If Threads integrates with the Fediverse then users will become accustomed to the content from Threads, which could cause more friction in the future if there's a movement to defederate from Threads. I think it would just be easier to avoid all that in the first place. I also feel like if anyone really wants to see Threads content they could make an account there, and then everyone gets what they want. Then there's all the downsides others are theorizing could happen, but they can't be comfirmed until Threads actually joins the Fediverse.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    You say this as if people haven't been eloquently arguing for defederating from Threads preemptively since motherfucking APRIL.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •