▲ 893 ▼ Their Bionic Eyes Are Now Obsolete and Unsupported (spectrum.ieee.org) submitted 2 years ago by yesdogishere@kbin.social to c/technology@lemmy.world 229 comments fedilink hide all child comments These early adopters found out what happened when a cutting-edge marvel became an obsolete gadget... inside their bodies.
[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 199 points 2 years ago (38 children) 👏 OPEN 👏 SOURCE 👏 AFTER 👏 OBSOLETION 👏 permalink fedilink source hideshow 38 child comments replies: [–] Chakravanti@sh.itjust.works 61 points 2 years ago (15 children) Fuck that. Free & Open Source Software ONLY for ANY bioimplant tech. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 15 child comments replies: [–] olutukko@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago (9 children) Why not just any tech? It's already obsolete. Nobody is going to profit from it. Why not let couple nerds tinker with it? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] Chakravanti@sh.itjust.works -4 points 2 years ago (8 children) Fuck ANY. ALL or STFU and you have no right to broadcast any kind of deception of the people en masse no less. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] olutukko@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (7 children) Jesus calm down lmao permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] Chakravanti@sh.itjust.works -2 points 2 years ago* (6 children) Stop reading emoji's in text just because you're sensitive. Jesus would little to no respect for your emotion inserted into others instead of being a true reading. Because it shows that you're the ignorant narcissist. Sure, there'll be plenty to disagree with me but it doesn't matter. I'm telling you the truth that you're broadcasting about your emotional stuckage. IDGAF what people read when there's nothnng there so I'm going ti ignore what you're trying to say to me unless you somehow learn to pull the truth, pusher. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] olutukko@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago* (5 children) What the hell man😂😂 maybe answer to the right comment next time Edit: unless this really was answer you meant for me in which case I just have no fucking clue what you're trying to say permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Chakravanti@sh.itjust.works -1 points 2 years ago (4 children) Don't read emotions in words because there are none. I don't emoji and I do what I can to be technically accurate. Doesn't stop people from making assumptions about my emotions any time I type. Stop assuming people have emotions just because you do when reading their words. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] olutukko@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (3 children) Maybe write in a way that doesn't include word like stfu then. Those sound quite mad. Also you calling me narcistic etc. Really makes you soind mad as hell so if it's a common problem for you that people assume your emotions wrongly then it's on you. Then your writing is shit. Also none of your comment hasnt been emotionless or technically accurate😂😂 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Chakravanti@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago (2 children) Reading emotions is on you. You think you know something from reading anything is narcissistic. You need an explanation of why? Easy. Explaining that the readings your pulling being doubled by others is, at best, mass delusion. Much more likely is you prodding for something you know jack shit about and instead probing with an assumption. I repeat, an assumption. Something you have absolutely zero basis but if you're right, then I'll react some obvious giving way. You're not. You know jack fucking squat and it's fucking obvious. Cussing is not an emotion, BTW. It's just my habit. One I care not to discard because it expresses exactly what I mean. But by all means, do your business and explain why you read emotions in my words. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] olutukko@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) If you think your writing dont give away tone of emotion and the people are narcistics if they assume your emotion based on your writing then you are pretty fucking stupid. Words have emtional wight that transfer trough text. And you started this nonsense text wars after me saying calm down which is pretty fucking ridiculous. Have a nice holidays, hope you meet a lot of fellow redditors who you can argue about the stupidest shit with permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Chakravanti@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago Calm down was sarcasm mocking your statement of assumption. permalink fedilink source parent [+] ArmokGoB@lemmy.dbzer0.com -7 points 2 years ago (4 children) IDK, I probably wouldn't want every anon having access to the source code for my cybereyes, let alone something like a pacemaker. Companies should be legally mandated to maintain devices like these for the average human life expectancy. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] areyouevenreal@lemm.ee 15 points 2 years ago Missing the fact Open Source software is generally more secure because more people are looking at the code. You don't need to see the source to find a vulnerability, you do need it to patch one properly though. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Winter8593@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago (1 child) Security through obscurity is not security permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] CAVOK@lemmy.world -2 points 2 years ago It's definitely one layer of security. If it's your only layer then you're in trouble. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Chakravanti@sh.itjust.works -2 points 2 years ago Ignorance. You don't understand any of the philosophy or the conduct of FOSS let alone close source. But...here...sign right here where the CIA/NSA/FBI/ETC. get any and all right to fuck you over any time the want to for any fucking reason. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Fades@lemmy.world 48 points 2 years ago (14 children) They exist to make money not help humanity. Open source don’t make them money so they will never bother permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 14 child comments replies: [–] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 32 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (8 children) They exist to make money not help humanity. From the article... Greenberg spent many years developing the technology while working at the Alfred Mann Foundation, a nonprofit organization that develops biomedical devices EDIT: For those challenging what I am saying, I was speaking towards his motives, when I responded to this comment … They exist to make money not help humanity. I was challenging the notion that he did not care about humanity, and just wanted the money. Its ok to want to help others AND make money doing it. (Unfortunately) We live in a society where money is needed to exist. EDIT2: I'm all for open source. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] Bahalex@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago (1 child) “he spun off the company Second Sight with three cofounders in 1998” The rest of the sentence from your quote. The company that put these implants into people was, from what I understand, indeed for profit. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago Kind of hard to operate a company without also making money doing so. The two are not mutually exclusive to each other. permalink fedilink source parent [–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 6 points 2 years ago He should have made it open sauce permalink fedilink source parent [–] eksb@programming.dev 6 points 2 years ago (4 children) Non-profits, just like for-profits, need to keep revenue at or above expenditures. Just like for-profits they end up run by executives who prioritize bringing money in to sustain the bureaucracy over doing good. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* Just like for-profits they end up run by executives who prioritize bringing money in to sustain the bureaucracy over doing good. I'm going to push back against this part of your comment. You are making an assumption. You can do both, help Humanity AND make money (since we live in a society that requires money to exist). permalink fedilink source parent [–] guacupado@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Feel free to enlighten them on how to run a beneficial company with no income. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago Government grants... A là Lockmart. permalink fedilink source parent [+] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] doctorcrimson@lemmy.today 20 points 2 years ago Open Source can and very often is profitable, though. Large companies like to trade technologies as assets, but a lot of people don't realize that as individuals they can claim full rights and ownership over their product while also making it free to use and modify. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Snapz@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago (1 child) You're giving a roundabout justification for regulation. It should not be their choice when are discussing items/services that impact health this directly. Buy the ticket (release product and profit) take the ride (support for the life of installed user base at least). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] anarchy79@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago Regulation is the only way the capitalist model works. Think about it, limiting capitalism is a majorly important part of making any part of it work because it's so backwards. permalink fedilink source parent [–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 9 points 2 years ago (1 child) I vote for parties that are pro-opensource and promote opensource among friends and family. It's all I can do. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] anarchy79@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago What if the party is also for child murder? And what if the other one who is against child murder is also anti-open source? permalink fedilink source parent [–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago This shit should be eminent domained and open sourced. It's in the public's best interest to have this tech available and if the people who invested in making it don't want to support it or sell it to a company that will, they don't need it anymore. permalink fedilink source parent [+] vsh@lemm.ee 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] ChewTiger@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago (3 children) The same as a closed source one? What does charging something have to do with an app? I'm not even sure what you're saying. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [+] vsh@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] LrdThndr@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) Open source hardware is a thing. See: raspberry pi, pine64, etc. In hardware, open source means the schematics are available and the device is built with commonly available components; eg: no proprietary chips, standard discrete components, pcb schematics and plans available. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] vsh@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent [–] anarchy79@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago 👏IS👏THIS👏A👏SONG👏SHOULD👏WE👏CLAP👏ALONG👏RAMA👏LAMA👏DING👏DONG👏SONG👏 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Chakravanti@sh.itjust.works 61 points 2 years ago (15 children) Fuck that. Free & Open Source Software ONLY for ANY bioimplant tech. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 15 child comments replies: [–] olutukko@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago (9 children) Why not just any tech? It's already obsolete. Nobody is going to profit from it. Why not let couple nerds tinker with it? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] Chakravanti@sh.itjust.works -4 points 2 years ago (8 children) Fuck ANY. ALL or STFU and you have no right to broadcast any kind of deception of the people en masse no less. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] olutukko@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (7 children) Jesus calm down lmao permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] Chakravanti@sh.itjust.works -2 points 2 years ago* (6 children) Stop reading emoji's in text just because you're sensitive. Jesus would little to no respect for your emotion inserted into others instead of being a true reading. Because it shows that you're the ignorant narcissist. Sure, there'll be plenty to disagree with me but it doesn't matter. I'm telling you the truth that you're broadcasting about your emotional stuckage. IDGAF what people read when there's nothnng there so I'm going ti ignore what you're trying to say to me unless you somehow learn to pull the truth, pusher. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] olutukko@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago* (5 children) What the hell man😂😂 maybe answer to the right comment next time Edit: unless this really was answer you meant for me in which case I just have no fucking clue what you're trying to say permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Chakravanti@sh.itjust.works -1 points 2 years ago (4 children) Don't read emotions in words because there are none. I don't emoji and I do what I can to be technically accurate. Doesn't stop people from making assumptions about my emotions any time I type. Stop assuming people have emotions just because you do when reading their words. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] olutukko@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (3 children) Maybe write in a way that doesn't include word like stfu then. Those sound quite mad. Also you calling me narcistic etc. Really makes you soind mad as hell so if it's a common problem for you that people assume your emotions wrongly then it's on you. Then your writing is shit. Also none of your comment hasnt been emotionless or technically accurate😂😂 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Chakravanti@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago (2 children) Reading emotions is on you. You think you know something from reading anything is narcissistic. You need an explanation of why? Easy. Explaining that the readings your pulling being doubled by others is, at best, mass delusion. Much more likely is you prodding for something you know jack shit about and instead probing with an assumption. I repeat, an assumption. Something you have absolutely zero basis but if you're right, then I'll react some obvious giving way. You're not. You know jack fucking squat and it's fucking obvious. Cussing is not an emotion, BTW. It's just my habit. One I care not to discard because it expresses exactly what I mean. But by all means, do your business and explain why you read emotions in my words. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] olutukko@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) If you think your writing dont give away tone of emotion and the people are narcistics if they assume your emotion based on your writing then you are pretty fucking stupid. Words have emtional wight that transfer trough text. And you started this nonsense text wars after me saying calm down which is pretty fucking ridiculous. Have a nice holidays, hope you meet a lot of fellow redditors who you can argue about the stupidest shit with permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Chakravanti@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago Calm down was sarcasm mocking your statement of assumption. permalink fedilink source parent [+] ArmokGoB@lemmy.dbzer0.com -7 points 2 years ago (4 children) IDK, I probably wouldn't want every anon having access to the source code for my cybereyes, let alone something like a pacemaker. Companies should be legally mandated to maintain devices like these for the average human life expectancy. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] areyouevenreal@lemm.ee 15 points 2 years ago Missing the fact Open Source software is generally more secure because more people are looking at the code. You don't need to see the source to find a vulnerability, you do need it to patch one properly though. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Winter8593@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago (1 child) Security through obscurity is not security permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] CAVOK@lemmy.world -2 points 2 years ago It's definitely one layer of security. If it's your only layer then you're in trouble. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Chakravanti@sh.itjust.works -2 points 2 years ago Ignorance. You don't understand any of the philosophy or the conduct of FOSS let alone close source. But...here...sign right here where the CIA/NSA/FBI/ETC. get any and all right to fuck you over any time the want to for any fucking reason. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] olutukko@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago (9 children) Why not just any tech? It's already obsolete. Nobody is going to profit from it. Why not let couple nerds tinker with it? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] Chakravanti@sh.itjust.works -4 points 2 years ago (8 children) Fuck ANY. ALL or STFU and you have no right to broadcast any kind of deception of the people en masse no less. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] olutukko@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (7 children) Jesus calm down lmao permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] Chakravanti@sh.itjust.works -2 points 2 years ago* (6 children) Stop reading emoji's in text just because you're sensitive. Jesus would little to no respect for your emotion inserted into others instead of being a true reading. Because it shows that you're the ignorant narcissist. Sure, there'll be plenty to disagree with me but it doesn't matter. I'm telling you the truth that you're broadcasting about your emotional stuckage. IDGAF what people read when there's nothnng there so I'm going ti ignore what you're trying to say to me unless you somehow learn to pull the truth, pusher. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] olutukko@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago* (5 children) What the hell man😂😂 maybe answer to the right comment next time Edit: unless this really was answer you meant for me in which case I just have no fucking clue what you're trying to say permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Chakravanti@sh.itjust.works -1 points 2 years ago (4 children) Don't read emotions in words because there are none. I don't emoji and I do what I can to be technically accurate. Doesn't stop people from making assumptions about my emotions any time I type. Stop assuming people have emotions just because you do when reading their words. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] olutukko@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (3 children) Maybe write in a way that doesn't include word like stfu then. Those sound quite mad. Also you calling me narcistic etc. Really makes you soind mad as hell so if it's a common problem for you that people assume your emotions wrongly then it's on you. Then your writing is shit. Also none of your comment hasnt been emotionless or technically accurate😂😂 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Chakravanti@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago (2 children) Reading emotions is on you. You think you know something from reading anything is narcissistic. You need an explanation of why? Easy. Explaining that the readings your pulling being doubled by others is, at best, mass delusion. Much more likely is you prodding for something you know jack shit about and instead probing with an assumption. I repeat, an assumption. Something you have absolutely zero basis but if you're right, then I'll react some obvious giving way. You're not. You know jack fucking squat and it's fucking obvious. Cussing is not an emotion, BTW. It's just my habit. One I care not to discard because it expresses exactly what I mean. But by all means, do your business and explain why you read emotions in my words. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] olutukko@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) If you think your writing dont give away tone of emotion and the people are narcistics if they assume your emotion based on your writing then you are pretty fucking stupid. Words have emtional wight that transfer trough text. And you started this nonsense text wars after me saying calm down which is pretty fucking ridiculous. Have a nice holidays, hope you meet a lot of fellow redditors who you can argue about the stupidest shit with permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Chakravanti@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago Calm down was sarcasm mocking your statement of assumption. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Chakravanti@sh.itjust.works -4 points 2 years ago (8 children) Fuck ANY. ALL or STFU and you have no right to broadcast any kind of deception of the people en masse no less. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] olutukko@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (7 children) Jesus calm down lmao permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] Chakravanti@sh.itjust.works -2 points 2 years ago* (6 children) Stop reading emoji's in text just because you're sensitive. Jesus would little to no respect for your emotion inserted into others instead of being a true reading. Because it shows that you're the ignorant narcissist. Sure, there'll be plenty to disagree with me but it doesn't matter. I'm telling you the truth that you're broadcasting about your emotional stuckage. IDGAF what people read when there's nothnng there so I'm going ti ignore what you're trying to say to me unless you somehow learn to pull the truth, pusher. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] olutukko@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago* (5 children) What the hell man😂😂 maybe answer to the right comment next time Edit: unless this really was answer you meant for me in which case I just have no fucking clue what you're trying to say permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Chakravanti@sh.itjust.works -1 points 2 years ago (4 children) Don't read emotions in words because there are none. I don't emoji and I do what I can to be technically accurate. Doesn't stop people from making assumptions about my emotions any time I type. Stop assuming people have emotions just because you do when reading their words. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] olutukko@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (3 children) Maybe write in a way that doesn't include word like stfu then. Those sound quite mad. Also you calling me narcistic etc. Really makes you soind mad as hell so if it's a common problem for you that people assume your emotions wrongly then it's on you. Then your writing is shit. Also none of your comment hasnt been emotionless or technically accurate😂😂 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Chakravanti@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago (2 children) Reading emotions is on you. You think you know something from reading anything is narcissistic. You need an explanation of why? Easy. Explaining that the readings your pulling being doubled by others is, at best, mass delusion. Much more likely is you prodding for something you know jack shit about and instead probing with an assumption. I repeat, an assumption. Something you have absolutely zero basis but if you're right, then I'll react some obvious giving way. You're not. You know jack fucking squat and it's fucking obvious. Cussing is not an emotion, BTW. It's just my habit. One I care not to discard because it expresses exactly what I mean. But by all means, do your business and explain why you read emotions in my words. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] olutukko@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) If you think your writing dont give away tone of emotion and the people are narcistics if they assume your emotion based on your writing then you are pretty fucking stupid. Words have emtional wight that transfer trough text. And you started this nonsense text wars after me saying calm down which is pretty fucking ridiculous. Have a nice holidays, hope you meet a lot of fellow redditors who you can argue about the stupidest shit with permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Chakravanti@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago Calm down was sarcasm mocking your statement of assumption. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] olutukko@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (7 children) Jesus calm down lmao permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] Chakravanti@sh.itjust.works -2 points 2 years ago* (6 children) Stop reading emoji's in text just because you're sensitive. Jesus would little to no respect for your emotion inserted into others instead of being a true reading. Because it shows that you're the ignorant narcissist. Sure, there'll be plenty to disagree with me but it doesn't matter. I'm telling you the truth that you're broadcasting about your emotional stuckage. IDGAF what people read when there's nothnng there so I'm going ti ignore what you're trying to say to me unless you somehow learn to pull the truth, pusher. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] olutukko@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago* (5 children) What the hell man😂😂 maybe answer to the right comment next time Edit: unless this really was answer you meant for me in which case I just have no fucking clue what you're trying to say permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Chakravanti@sh.itjust.works -1 points 2 years ago (4 children) Don't read emotions in words because there are none. I don't emoji and I do what I can to be technically accurate. Doesn't stop people from making assumptions about my emotions any time I type. Stop assuming people have emotions just because you do when reading their words. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] olutukko@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (3 children) Maybe write in a way that doesn't include word like stfu then. Those sound quite mad. Also you calling me narcistic etc. Really makes you soind mad as hell so if it's a common problem for you that people assume your emotions wrongly then it's on you. Then your writing is shit. Also none of your comment hasnt been emotionless or technically accurate😂😂 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Chakravanti@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago (2 children) Reading emotions is on you. You think you know something from reading anything is narcissistic. You need an explanation of why? Easy. Explaining that the readings your pulling being doubled by others is, at best, mass delusion. Much more likely is you prodding for something you know jack shit about and instead probing with an assumption. I repeat, an assumption. Something you have absolutely zero basis but if you're right, then I'll react some obvious giving way. You're not. You know jack fucking squat and it's fucking obvious. Cussing is not an emotion, BTW. It's just my habit. One I care not to discard because it expresses exactly what I mean. But by all means, do your business and explain why you read emotions in my words. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] olutukko@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) If you think your writing dont give away tone of emotion and the people are narcistics if they assume your emotion based on your writing then you are pretty fucking stupid. Words have emtional wight that transfer trough text. And you started this nonsense text wars after me saying calm down which is pretty fucking ridiculous. Have a nice holidays, hope you meet a lot of fellow redditors who you can argue about the stupidest shit with permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Chakravanti@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago Calm down was sarcasm mocking your statement of assumption. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Chakravanti@sh.itjust.works -2 points 2 years ago* (6 children) Stop reading emoji's in text just because you're sensitive. Jesus would little to no respect for your emotion inserted into others instead of being a true reading. Because it shows that you're the ignorant narcissist. Sure, there'll be plenty to disagree with me but it doesn't matter. I'm telling you the truth that you're broadcasting about your emotional stuckage. IDGAF what people read when there's nothnng there so I'm going ti ignore what you're trying to say to me unless you somehow learn to pull the truth, pusher. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] olutukko@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago* (5 children) What the hell man😂😂 maybe answer to the right comment next time Edit: unless this really was answer you meant for me in which case I just have no fucking clue what you're trying to say permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Chakravanti@sh.itjust.works -1 points 2 years ago (4 children) Don't read emotions in words because there are none. I don't emoji and I do what I can to be technically accurate. Doesn't stop people from making assumptions about my emotions any time I type. Stop assuming people have emotions just because you do when reading their words. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] olutukko@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (3 children) Maybe write in a way that doesn't include word like stfu then. Those sound quite mad. Also you calling me narcistic etc. Really makes you soind mad as hell so if it's a common problem for you that people assume your emotions wrongly then it's on you. Then your writing is shit. Also none of your comment hasnt been emotionless or technically accurate😂😂 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Chakravanti@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago (2 children) Reading emotions is on you. You think you know something from reading anything is narcissistic. You need an explanation of why? Easy. Explaining that the readings your pulling being doubled by others is, at best, mass delusion. Much more likely is you prodding for something you know jack shit about and instead probing with an assumption. I repeat, an assumption. Something you have absolutely zero basis but if you're right, then I'll react some obvious giving way. You're not. You know jack fucking squat and it's fucking obvious. Cussing is not an emotion, BTW. It's just my habit. One I care not to discard because it expresses exactly what I mean. But by all means, do your business and explain why you read emotions in my words. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] olutukko@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) If you think your writing dont give away tone of emotion and the people are narcistics if they assume your emotion based on your writing then you are pretty fucking stupid. Words have emtional wight that transfer trough text. And you started this nonsense text wars after me saying calm down which is pretty fucking ridiculous. Have a nice holidays, hope you meet a lot of fellow redditors who you can argue about the stupidest shit with permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Chakravanti@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago Calm down was sarcasm mocking your statement of assumption. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] olutukko@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago* (5 children) What the hell man😂😂 maybe answer to the right comment next time Edit: unless this really was answer you meant for me in which case I just have no fucking clue what you're trying to say permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Chakravanti@sh.itjust.works -1 points 2 years ago (4 children) Don't read emotions in words because there are none. I don't emoji and I do what I can to be technically accurate. Doesn't stop people from making assumptions about my emotions any time I type. Stop assuming people have emotions just because you do when reading their words. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] olutukko@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (3 children) Maybe write in a way that doesn't include word like stfu then. Those sound quite mad. Also you calling me narcistic etc. Really makes you soind mad as hell so if it's a common problem for you that people assume your emotions wrongly then it's on you. Then your writing is shit. Also none of your comment hasnt been emotionless or technically accurate😂😂 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Chakravanti@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago (2 children) Reading emotions is on you. You think you know something from reading anything is narcissistic. You need an explanation of why? Easy. Explaining that the readings your pulling being doubled by others is, at best, mass delusion. Much more likely is you prodding for something you know jack shit about and instead probing with an assumption. I repeat, an assumption. Something you have absolutely zero basis but if you're right, then I'll react some obvious giving way. You're not. You know jack fucking squat and it's fucking obvious. Cussing is not an emotion, BTW. It's just my habit. One I care not to discard because it expresses exactly what I mean. But by all means, do your business and explain why you read emotions in my words. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] olutukko@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) If you think your writing dont give away tone of emotion and the people are narcistics if they assume your emotion based on your writing then you are pretty fucking stupid. Words have emtional wight that transfer trough text. And you started this nonsense text wars after me saying calm down which is pretty fucking ridiculous. Have a nice holidays, hope you meet a lot of fellow redditors who you can argue about the stupidest shit with permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Chakravanti@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago Calm down was sarcasm mocking your statement of assumption. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Chakravanti@sh.itjust.works -1 points 2 years ago (4 children) Don't read emotions in words because there are none. I don't emoji and I do what I can to be technically accurate. Doesn't stop people from making assumptions about my emotions any time I type. Stop assuming people have emotions just because you do when reading their words. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] olutukko@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (3 children) Maybe write in a way that doesn't include word like stfu then. Those sound quite mad. Also you calling me narcistic etc. Really makes you soind mad as hell so if it's a common problem for you that people assume your emotions wrongly then it's on you. Then your writing is shit. Also none of your comment hasnt been emotionless or technically accurate😂😂 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Chakravanti@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago (2 children) Reading emotions is on you. You think you know something from reading anything is narcissistic. You need an explanation of why? Easy. Explaining that the readings your pulling being doubled by others is, at best, mass delusion. Much more likely is you prodding for something you know jack shit about and instead probing with an assumption. I repeat, an assumption. Something you have absolutely zero basis but if you're right, then I'll react some obvious giving way. You're not. You know jack fucking squat and it's fucking obvious. Cussing is not an emotion, BTW. It's just my habit. One I care not to discard because it expresses exactly what I mean. But by all means, do your business and explain why you read emotions in my words. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] olutukko@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) If you think your writing dont give away tone of emotion and the people are narcistics if they assume your emotion based on your writing then you are pretty fucking stupid. Words have emtional wight that transfer trough text. And you started this nonsense text wars after me saying calm down which is pretty fucking ridiculous. Have a nice holidays, hope you meet a lot of fellow redditors who you can argue about the stupidest shit with permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Chakravanti@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago Calm down was sarcasm mocking your statement of assumption. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] olutukko@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (3 children) Maybe write in a way that doesn't include word like stfu then. Those sound quite mad. Also you calling me narcistic etc. Really makes you soind mad as hell so if it's a common problem for you that people assume your emotions wrongly then it's on you. Then your writing is shit. Also none of your comment hasnt been emotionless or technically accurate😂😂 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Chakravanti@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago (2 children) Reading emotions is on you. You think you know something from reading anything is narcissistic. You need an explanation of why? Easy. Explaining that the readings your pulling being doubled by others is, at best, mass delusion. Much more likely is you prodding for something you know jack shit about and instead probing with an assumption. I repeat, an assumption. Something you have absolutely zero basis but if you're right, then I'll react some obvious giving way. You're not. You know jack fucking squat and it's fucking obvious. Cussing is not an emotion, BTW. It's just my habit. One I care not to discard because it expresses exactly what I mean. But by all means, do your business and explain why you read emotions in my words. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] olutukko@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) If you think your writing dont give away tone of emotion and the people are narcistics if they assume your emotion based on your writing then you are pretty fucking stupid. Words have emtional wight that transfer trough text. And you started this nonsense text wars after me saying calm down which is pretty fucking ridiculous. Have a nice holidays, hope you meet a lot of fellow redditors who you can argue about the stupidest shit with permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Chakravanti@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago Calm down was sarcasm mocking your statement of assumption. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Chakravanti@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago (2 children) Reading emotions is on you. You think you know something from reading anything is narcissistic. You need an explanation of why? Easy. Explaining that the readings your pulling being doubled by others is, at best, mass delusion. Much more likely is you prodding for something you know jack shit about and instead probing with an assumption. I repeat, an assumption. Something you have absolutely zero basis but if you're right, then I'll react some obvious giving way. You're not. You know jack fucking squat and it's fucking obvious. Cussing is not an emotion, BTW. It's just my habit. One I care not to discard because it expresses exactly what I mean. But by all means, do your business and explain why you read emotions in my words. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] olutukko@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) If you think your writing dont give away tone of emotion and the people are narcistics if they assume your emotion based on your writing then you are pretty fucking stupid. Words have emtional wight that transfer trough text. And you started this nonsense text wars after me saying calm down which is pretty fucking ridiculous. Have a nice holidays, hope you meet a lot of fellow redditors who you can argue about the stupidest shit with permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Chakravanti@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago Calm down was sarcasm mocking your statement of assumption. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] olutukko@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) If you think your writing dont give away tone of emotion and the people are narcistics if they assume your emotion based on your writing then you are pretty fucking stupid. Words have emtional wight that transfer trough text. And you started this nonsense text wars after me saying calm down which is pretty fucking ridiculous. Have a nice holidays, hope you meet a lot of fellow redditors who you can argue about the stupidest shit with permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Chakravanti@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago Calm down was sarcasm mocking your statement of assumption. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Chakravanti@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago Calm down was sarcasm mocking your statement of assumption. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] ArmokGoB@lemmy.dbzer0.com -7 points 2 years ago (4 children) IDK, I probably wouldn't want every anon having access to the source code for my cybereyes, let alone something like a pacemaker. Companies should be legally mandated to maintain devices like these for the average human life expectancy. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] areyouevenreal@lemm.ee 15 points 2 years ago Missing the fact Open Source software is generally more secure because more people are looking at the code. You don't need to see the source to find a vulnerability, you do need it to patch one properly though. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Winter8593@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago (1 child) Security through obscurity is not security permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] CAVOK@lemmy.world -2 points 2 years ago It's definitely one layer of security. If it's your only layer then you're in trouble. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Chakravanti@sh.itjust.works -2 points 2 years ago Ignorance. You don't understand any of the philosophy or the conduct of FOSS let alone close source. But...here...sign right here where the CIA/NSA/FBI/ETC. get any and all right to fuck you over any time the want to for any fucking reason. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] areyouevenreal@lemm.ee 15 points 2 years ago Missing the fact Open Source software is generally more secure because more people are looking at the code. You don't need to see the source to find a vulnerability, you do need it to patch one properly though. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Winter8593@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago (1 child) Security through obscurity is not security permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] CAVOK@lemmy.world -2 points 2 years ago It's definitely one layer of security. If it's your only layer then you're in trouble. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] CAVOK@lemmy.world -2 points 2 years ago It's definitely one layer of security. If it's your only layer then you're in trouble. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Chakravanti@sh.itjust.works -2 points 2 years ago Ignorance. You don't understand any of the philosophy or the conduct of FOSS let alone close source. But...here...sign right here where the CIA/NSA/FBI/ETC. get any and all right to fuck you over any time the want to for any fucking reason. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Fades@lemmy.world 48 points 2 years ago (14 children) They exist to make money not help humanity. Open source don’t make them money so they will never bother permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 14 child comments replies: [–] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 32 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (8 children) They exist to make money not help humanity. From the article... Greenberg spent many years developing the technology while working at the Alfred Mann Foundation, a nonprofit organization that develops biomedical devices EDIT: For those challenging what I am saying, I was speaking towards his motives, when I responded to this comment … They exist to make money not help humanity. I was challenging the notion that he did not care about humanity, and just wanted the money. Its ok to want to help others AND make money doing it. (Unfortunately) We live in a society where money is needed to exist. EDIT2: I'm all for open source. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] Bahalex@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago (1 child) “he spun off the company Second Sight with three cofounders in 1998” The rest of the sentence from your quote. The company that put these implants into people was, from what I understand, indeed for profit. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago Kind of hard to operate a company without also making money doing so. The two are not mutually exclusive to each other. permalink fedilink source parent [–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 6 points 2 years ago He should have made it open sauce permalink fedilink source parent [–] eksb@programming.dev 6 points 2 years ago (4 children) Non-profits, just like for-profits, need to keep revenue at or above expenditures. Just like for-profits they end up run by executives who prioritize bringing money in to sustain the bureaucracy over doing good. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* Just like for-profits they end up run by executives who prioritize bringing money in to sustain the bureaucracy over doing good. I'm going to push back against this part of your comment. You are making an assumption. You can do both, help Humanity AND make money (since we live in a society that requires money to exist). permalink fedilink source parent [–] guacupado@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Feel free to enlighten them on how to run a beneficial company with no income. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago Government grants... A là Lockmart. permalink fedilink source parent [+] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] doctorcrimson@lemmy.today 20 points 2 years ago Open Source can and very often is profitable, though. Large companies like to trade technologies as assets, but a lot of people don't realize that as individuals they can claim full rights and ownership over their product while also making it free to use and modify. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Snapz@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago (1 child) You're giving a roundabout justification for regulation. It should not be their choice when are discussing items/services that impact health this directly. Buy the ticket (release product and profit) take the ride (support for the life of installed user base at least). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] anarchy79@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago Regulation is the only way the capitalist model works. Think about it, limiting capitalism is a majorly important part of making any part of it work because it's so backwards. permalink fedilink source parent [–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 9 points 2 years ago (1 child) I vote for parties that are pro-opensource and promote opensource among friends and family. It's all I can do. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] anarchy79@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago What if the party is also for child murder? And what if the other one who is against child murder is also anti-open source? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 32 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (8 children) They exist to make money not help humanity. From the article... Greenberg spent many years developing the technology while working at the Alfred Mann Foundation, a nonprofit organization that develops biomedical devices EDIT: For those challenging what I am saying, I was speaking towards his motives, when I responded to this comment … They exist to make money not help humanity. I was challenging the notion that he did not care about humanity, and just wanted the money. Its ok to want to help others AND make money doing it. (Unfortunately) We live in a society where money is needed to exist. EDIT2: I'm all for open source. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] Bahalex@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago (1 child) “he spun off the company Second Sight with three cofounders in 1998” The rest of the sentence from your quote. The company that put these implants into people was, from what I understand, indeed for profit. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago Kind of hard to operate a company without also making money doing so. The two are not mutually exclusive to each other. permalink fedilink source parent [–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 6 points 2 years ago He should have made it open sauce permalink fedilink source parent [–] eksb@programming.dev 6 points 2 years ago (4 children) Non-profits, just like for-profits, need to keep revenue at or above expenditures. Just like for-profits they end up run by executives who prioritize bringing money in to sustain the bureaucracy over doing good. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* Just like for-profits they end up run by executives who prioritize bringing money in to sustain the bureaucracy over doing good. I'm going to push back against this part of your comment. You are making an assumption. You can do both, help Humanity AND make money (since we live in a society that requires money to exist). permalink fedilink source parent [–] guacupado@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Feel free to enlighten them on how to run a beneficial company with no income. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago Government grants... A là Lockmart. permalink fedilink source parent [+] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Bahalex@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago (1 child) “he spun off the company Second Sight with three cofounders in 1998” The rest of the sentence from your quote. The company that put these implants into people was, from what I understand, indeed for profit. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago Kind of hard to operate a company without also making money doing so. The two are not mutually exclusive to each other. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago Kind of hard to operate a company without also making money doing so. The two are not mutually exclusive to each other. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 6 points 2 years ago He should have made it open sauce permalink fedilink source parent
[–] eksb@programming.dev 6 points 2 years ago (4 children) Non-profits, just like for-profits, need to keep revenue at or above expenditures. Just like for-profits they end up run by executives who prioritize bringing money in to sustain the bureaucracy over doing good. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* Just like for-profits they end up run by executives who prioritize bringing money in to sustain the bureaucracy over doing good. I'm going to push back against this part of your comment. You are making an assumption. You can do both, help Humanity AND make money (since we live in a society that requires money to exist). permalink fedilink source parent [–] guacupado@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Feel free to enlighten them on how to run a beneficial company with no income. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago Government grants... A là Lockmart. permalink fedilink source parent [+] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* Just like for-profits they end up run by executives who prioritize bringing money in to sustain the bureaucracy over doing good. I'm going to push back against this part of your comment. You are making an assumption. You can do both, help Humanity AND make money (since we live in a society that requires money to exist). permalink fedilink source parent
[–] guacupado@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Feel free to enlighten them on how to run a beneficial company with no income. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago Government grants... A là Lockmart. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago Government grants... A là Lockmart. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] doctorcrimson@lemmy.today 20 points 2 years ago Open Source can and very often is profitable, though. Large companies like to trade technologies as assets, but a lot of people don't realize that as individuals they can claim full rights and ownership over their product while also making it free to use and modify. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago (1 child) You're giving a roundabout justification for regulation. It should not be their choice when are discussing items/services that impact health this directly. Buy the ticket (release product and profit) take the ride (support for the life of installed user base at least). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] anarchy79@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago Regulation is the only way the capitalist model works. Think about it, limiting capitalism is a majorly important part of making any part of it work because it's so backwards. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] anarchy79@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago Regulation is the only way the capitalist model works. Think about it, limiting capitalism is a majorly important part of making any part of it work because it's so backwards. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 9 points 2 years ago (1 child) I vote for parties that are pro-opensource and promote opensource among friends and family. It's all I can do. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] anarchy79@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago What if the party is also for child murder? And what if the other one who is against child murder is also anti-open source? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] anarchy79@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago What if the party is also for child murder? And what if the other one who is against child murder is also anti-open source? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago This shit should be eminent domained and open sourced. It's in the public's best interest to have this tech available and if the people who invested in making it don't want to support it or sell it to a company that will, they don't need it anymore. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] vsh@lemm.ee 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] ChewTiger@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago (3 children) The same as a closed source one? What does charging something have to do with an app? I'm not even sure what you're saying. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [+] vsh@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] LrdThndr@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) Open source hardware is a thing. See: raspberry pi, pine64, etc. In hardware, open source means the schematics are available and the device is built with commonly available components; eg: no proprietary chips, standard discrete components, pcb schematics and plans available. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] vsh@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ChewTiger@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago (3 children) The same as a closed source one? What does charging something have to do with an app? I'm not even sure what you're saying. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [+] vsh@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] LrdThndr@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) Open source hardware is a thing. See: raspberry pi, pine64, etc. In hardware, open source means the schematics are available and the device is built with commonly available components; eg: no proprietary chips, standard discrete components, pcb schematics and plans available. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] vsh@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent
[+] vsh@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] LrdThndr@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) Open source hardware is a thing. See: raspberry pi, pine64, etc. In hardware, open source means the schematics are available and the device is built with commonly available components; eg: no proprietary chips, standard discrete components, pcb schematics and plans available. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] vsh@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] LrdThndr@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) Open source hardware is a thing. See: raspberry pi, pine64, etc. In hardware, open source means the schematics are available and the device is built with commonly available components; eg: no proprietary chips, standard discrete components, pcb schematics and plans available. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] vsh@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent
[+] vsh@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] anarchy79@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago 👏IS👏THIS👏A👏SONG👏SHOULD👏WE👏CLAP👏ALONG👏RAMA👏LAMA👏DING👏DONG👏SONG👏 permalink fedilink source parent