you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 31 points 2 years ago (7 children)

Aside from the obvious reasons of competition, Beeper also used Apples infrastructure, that Beeper was then going to monetize. Not too surprising they shut it down.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    No, they were charging money as they had their own APN to BPN bridge. Plus the usual cost of development and more.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    To keep Beeper Mini running, Beeper uses a Beeper Push Notification (BPN) service to connect to Apple's servers and notify you of new messages.

    And it uses Apples gateway service for setup.

    arstechnica.com/gadgets/2023/12/beeper-mini-on-android-claims-to-have-reverse-engineered-imessage-compatibility

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago

    Yes. I did mention APN (Apple Push Notifications) to Beeper Push Notifications which then routes via FCM for Android. The whole setup does require active server cost + time to work on the app to bring it to parity with iMessage Features.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -4 points 2 years ago (3 children)
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Apple already knows that iMessage, alone, is a huge selling point for their iPhones. They held out for a few years keeping iTunes away from the rest of us before finally giving in, but I very much doubt that they're going to open up iMessage any time soon. It's pretty much the only thing that keeps iPhone users in their ecosystem anymore.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago

    That's true, but it would be more Applelike to develop their own app. They obviously know how to do it, then they could have 100% of the profits and not have to deal with a partner. But Tim Cook said they re not interested in doing anything like that.

  • source
  • parent