▲ 301 ▼ Welcome to the official community for Voyager (formerly wefwef)! (lemmy.world) submitted 3 years ago by aeharding@lemmy.world [M] to c/voyagerapp@lemmy.world 85 comments fedilink hide all child comments Thanks for subscribing and bearing with the awkwardness of renaming over the next week or so :)
[–] nix@merv.news 11 points 3 years ago (7 children) Will Voyager be available in app stores? permalink fedilink source hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] Fleecer74@lemmy.sdf.org -3 points 3 years ago (6 children) It’s a web app so there’s no point permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] nix@merv.news 11 points 3 years ago (5 children) There is a point because its much easier to get people to start using an app they can get from app stores. Also lots of apps are built as web apps regardless permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Fleecer74@lemmy.sdf.org -1 points 3 years ago (4 children) I meant it’s a pwa so you can add it to your Home Screen and it will act like a native app permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] nix@merv.news 5 points 3 years ago (3 children) Again, most people browse through apps and find apps on the App Store. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Fleecer74@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 3 years ago (2 children) It’s pointless to pay to get on the app stores when the apps work perfectly fine as a web app. Also most people will eventually find out about wefwef/voyage since it’s getting recommended everywhere. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DrM@feddit.de 4 points 3 years ago (1 child) It really doesnt matter if its pointless or not. There is a familiarity with App-Store Apps, PWAs are a "new" concept for the vast majority of people. While they exist for a really long time now, almost nobody uses them. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Fleecer74@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 3 years ago* It’s mainly the fees that both the google play store and Apple App Store charge, I’m not sure if the developer is willing to pay the fees. Also the dev would have to put the app in a wrapper which isn’t worth the effort and Lemmy isn’t mainstream so they wouldn’t be loosing any traffic or money permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Fleecer74@lemmy.sdf.org -3 points 3 years ago (6 children) It’s a web app so there’s no point permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] nix@merv.news 11 points 3 years ago (5 children) There is a point because its much easier to get people to start using an app they can get from app stores. Also lots of apps are built as web apps regardless permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Fleecer74@lemmy.sdf.org -1 points 3 years ago (4 children) I meant it’s a pwa so you can add it to your Home Screen and it will act like a native app permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] nix@merv.news 5 points 3 years ago (3 children) Again, most people browse through apps and find apps on the App Store. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Fleecer74@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 3 years ago (2 children) It’s pointless to pay to get on the app stores when the apps work perfectly fine as a web app. Also most people will eventually find out about wefwef/voyage since it’s getting recommended everywhere. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DrM@feddit.de 4 points 3 years ago (1 child) It really doesnt matter if its pointless or not. There is a familiarity with App-Store Apps, PWAs are a "new" concept for the vast majority of people. While they exist for a really long time now, almost nobody uses them. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Fleecer74@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 3 years ago* It’s mainly the fees that both the google play store and Apple App Store charge, I’m not sure if the developer is willing to pay the fees. Also the dev would have to put the app in a wrapper which isn’t worth the effort and Lemmy isn’t mainstream so they wouldn’t be loosing any traffic or money permalink fedilink source parent
[–] nix@merv.news 11 points 3 years ago (5 children) There is a point because its much easier to get people to start using an app they can get from app stores. Also lots of apps are built as web apps regardless permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Fleecer74@lemmy.sdf.org -1 points 3 years ago (4 children) I meant it’s a pwa so you can add it to your Home Screen and it will act like a native app permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] nix@merv.news 5 points 3 years ago (3 children) Again, most people browse through apps and find apps on the App Store. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Fleecer74@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 3 years ago (2 children) It’s pointless to pay to get on the app stores when the apps work perfectly fine as a web app. Also most people will eventually find out about wefwef/voyage since it’s getting recommended everywhere. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DrM@feddit.de 4 points 3 years ago (1 child) It really doesnt matter if its pointless or not. There is a familiarity with App-Store Apps, PWAs are a "new" concept for the vast majority of people. While they exist for a really long time now, almost nobody uses them. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Fleecer74@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 3 years ago* It’s mainly the fees that both the google play store and Apple App Store charge, I’m not sure if the developer is willing to pay the fees. Also the dev would have to put the app in a wrapper which isn’t worth the effort and Lemmy isn’t mainstream so they wouldn’t be loosing any traffic or money permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Fleecer74@lemmy.sdf.org -1 points 3 years ago (4 children) I meant it’s a pwa so you can add it to your Home Screen and it will act like a native app permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] nix@merv.news 5 points 3 years ago (3 children) Again, most people browse through apps and find apps on the App Store. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Fleecer74@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 3 years ago (2 children) It’s pointless to pay to get on the app stores when the apps work perfectly fine as a web app. Also most people will eventually find out about wefwef/voyage since it’s getting recommended everywhere. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DrM@feddit.de 4 points 3 years ago (1 child) It really doesnt matter if its pointless or not. There is a familiarity with App-Store Apps, PWAs are a "new" concept for the vast majority of people. While they exist for a really long time now, almost nobody uses them. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Fleecer74@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 3 years ago* It’s mainly the fees that both the google play store and Apple App Store charge, I’m not sure if the developer is willing to pay the fees. Also the dev would have to put the app in a wrapper which isn’t worth the effort and Lemmy isn’t mainstream so they wouldn’t be loosing any traffic or money permalink fedilink source parent
[–] nix@merv.news 5 points 3 years ago (3 children) Again, most people browse through apps and find apps on the App Store. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Fleecer74@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 3 years ago (2 children) It’s pointless to pay to get on the app stores when the apps work perfectly fine as a web app. Also most people will eventually find out about wefwef/voyage since it’s getting recommended everywhere. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DrM@feddit.de 4 points 3 years ago (1 child) It really doesnt matter if its pointless or not. There is a familiarity with App-Store Apps, PWAs are a "new" concept for the vast majority of people. While they exist for a really long time now, almost nobody uses them. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Fleecer74@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 3 years ago* It’s mainly the fees that both the google play store and Apple App Store charge, I’m not sure if the developer is willing to pay the fees. Also the dev would have to put the app in a wrapper which isn’t worth the effort and Lemmy isn’t mainstream so they wouldn’t be loosing any traffic or money permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Fleecer74@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 3 years ago (2 children) It’s pointless to pay to get on the app stores when the apps work perfectly fine as a web app. Also most people will eventually find out about wefwef/voyage since it’s getting recommended everywhere. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DrM@feddit.de 4 points 3 years ago (1 child) It really doesnt matter if its pointless or not. There is a familiarity with App-Store Apps, PWAs are a "new" concept for the vast majority of people. While they exist for a really long time now, almost nobody uses them. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Fleecer74@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 3 years ago* It’s mainly the fees that both the google play store and Apple App Store charge, I’m not sure if the developer is willing to pay the fees. Also the dev would have to put the app in a wrapper which isn’t worth the effort and Lemmy isn’t mainstream so they wouldn’t be loosing any traffic or money permalink fedilink source parent
[–] DrM@feddit.de 4 points 3 years ago (1 child) It really doesnt matter if its pointless or not. There is a familiarity with App-Store Apps, PWAs are a "new" concept for the vast majority of people. While they exist for a really long time now, almost nobody uses them. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Fleecer74@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 3 years ago* It’s mainly the fees that both the google play store and Apple App Store charge, I’m not sure if the developer is willing to pay the fees. Also the dev would have to put the app in a wrapper which isn’t worth the effort and Lemmy isn’t mainstream so they wouldn’t be loosing any traffic or money permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Fleecer74@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 3 years ago* It’s mainly the fees that both the google play store and Apple App Store charge, I’m not sure if the developer is willing to pay the fees. Also the dev would have to put the app in a wrapper which isn’t worth the effort and Lemmy isn’t mainstream so they wouldn’t be loosing any traffic or money permalink fedilink source parent