▲ 395 ▼ ‘Nudify’ Apps That Use AI to ‘Undress’ Women in Photos Are Soaring in Popularity (time.com) submitted 2 years ago by L4s@lemmy.world [M, B] to c/technology@lemmy.world 227 comments fedilink hide all child comments ‘Nudify’ Apps That Use AI to ‘Undress’ Women in Photos Are Soaring in Popularity::It’s part of a worrying trend of non-consensual “deepfake” pornography being developed and distributed because of advances in artificial intelligence.
[+] helenslunch@feddit.nl 12 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (8 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] jivandabeast@lemmy.browntown.dev 1 point 2 years ago (7 children) We're talking specifically about AI enhanced fakes, not the old school Photoshop fakes -- they're two completely different beasts permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [+] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] jivandabeast@lemmy.browntown.dev -3 points 2 years ago (5 children) No I disagree because before you could tell a fake from a mile away, but deepfakes bring it to a whole new level of creepy because they can be EXTREMELY convincing permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [+] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Delta_V@midwest.social 2 points 2 years ago Or maybe an accessibility improvement. You don't need to practice creating your own works of art over many years anymore, or have enough money to commission a master artist. The AI artists are good enough and work for cheap. permalink fedilink source parent [–] barsoap@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago The difference is that we now can do video. I mean in principle that was possible before but also a hell of a lot of work. Making it look real hasn't been a problem since before Photoshop, if anything people get sloppy with AI also because a felt 99% of people who use AI don't have an artistic bone in their body. permalink fedilink source parent [–] jivandabeast@lemmy.browntown.dev 1 point 2 years ago I'm not saying that it's a shift in nature? All I've been saying is: A) tools to create realistic nudes have been publicly available ever since deepfakes became a thing B) deepfakes are worse than traditional photoshopped nudes because (as you put it, a quality improvement) they're more convincing and therefore can have more detrimental effects permalink fedilink source parent [–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 4 points 2 years ago There was a brief period between now and the invention of photography when that was true. For thousands of years before that it was possible to create a visual representation of anything you imagine without any hint that it wasn't something real. Makes me wonder if there were similar controversies about drawings or paintings. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] jivandabeast@lemmy.browntown.dev 1 point 2 years ago (7 children) We're talking specifically about AI enhanced fakes, not the old school Photoshop fakes -- they're two completely different beasts permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [+] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] jivandabeast@lemmy.browntown.dev -3 points 2 years ago (5 children) No I disagree because before you could tell a fake from a mile away, but deepfakes bring it to a whole new level of creepy because they can be EXTREMELY convincing permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [+] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Delta_V@midwest.social 2 points 2 years ago Or maybe an accessibility improvement. You don't need to practice creating your own works of art over many years anymore, or have enough money to commission a master artist. The AI artists are good enough and work for cheap. permalink fedilink source parent [–] barsoap@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago The difference is that we now can do video. I mean in principle that was possible before but also a hell of a lot of work. Making it look real hasn't been a problem since before Photoshop, if anything people get sloppy with AI also because a felt 99% of people who use AI don't have an artistic bone in their body. permalink fedilink source parent [–] jivandabeast@lemmy.browntown.dev 1 point 2 years ago I'm not saying that it's a shift in nature? All I've been saying is: A) tools to create realistic nudes have been publicly available ever since deepfakes became a thing B) deepfakes are worse than traditional photoshopped nudes because (as you put it, a quality improvement) they're more convincing and therefore can have more detrimental effects permalink fedilink source parent [–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 4 points 2 years ago There was a brief period between now and the invention of photography when that was true. For thousands of years before that it was possible to create a visual representation of anything you imagine without any hint that it wasn't something real. Makes me wonder if there were similar controversies about drawings or paintings. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] jivandabeast@lemmy.browntown.dev -3 points 2 years ago (5 children) No I disagree because before you could tell a fake from a mile away, but deepfakes bring it to a whole new level of creepy because they can be EXTREMELY convincing permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [+] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Delta_V@midwest.social 2 points 2 years ago Or maybe an accessibility improvement. You don't need to practice creating your own works of art over many years anymore, or have enough money to commission a master artist. The AI artists are good enough and work for cheap. permalink fedilink source parent [–] barsoap@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago The difference is that we now can do video. I mean in principle that was possible before but also a hell of a lot of work. Making it look real hasn't been a problem since before Photoshop, if anything people get sloppy with AI also because a felt 99% of people who use AI don't have an artistic bone in their body. permalink fedilink source parent [–] jivandabeast@lemmy.browntown.dev 1 point 2 years ago I'm not saying that it's a shift in nature? All I've been saying is: A) tools to create realistic nudes have been publicly available ever since deepfakes became a thing B) deepfakes are worse than traditional photoshopped nudes because (as you put it, a quality improvement) they're more convincing and therefore can have more detrimental effects permalink fedilink source parent [–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 4 points 2 years ago There was a brief period between now and the invention of photography when that was true. For thousands of years before that it was possible to create a visual representation of anything you imagine without any hint that it wasn't something real. Makes me wonder if there were similar controversies about drawings or paintings. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] jivandabeast@lemmy.browntown.dev -3 points 2 years ago (5 children) No I disagree because before you could tell a fake from a mile away, but deepfakes bring it to a whole new level of creepy because they can be EXTREMELY convincing permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [+] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Delta_V@midwest.social 2 points 2 years ago Or maybe an accessibility improvement. You don't need to practice creating your own works of art over many years anymore, or have enough money to commission a master artist. The AI artists are good enough and work for cheap. permalink fedilink source parent [–] barsoap@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago The difference is that we now can do video. I mean in principle that was possible before but also a hell of a lot of work. Making it look real hasn't been a problem since before Photoshop, if anything people get sloppy with AI also because a felt 99% of people who use AI don't have an artistic bone in their body. permalink fedilink source parent [–] jivandabeast@lemmy.browntown.dev 1 point 2 years ago I'm not saying that it's a shift in nature? All I've been saying is: A) tools to create realistic nudes have been publicly available ever since deepfakes became a thing B) deepfakes are worse than traditional photoshopped nudes because (as you put it, a quality improvement) they're more convincing and therefore can have more detrimental effects permalink fedilink source parent [–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 4 points 2 years ago There was a brief period between now and the invention of photography when that was true. For thousands of years before that it was possible to create a visual representation of anything you imagine without any hint that it wasn't something real. Makes me wonder if there were similar controversies about drawings or paintings. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Delta_V@midwest.social 2 points 2 years ago Or maybe an accessibility improvement. You don't need to practice creating your own works of art over many years anymore, or have enough money to commission a master artist. The AI artists are good enough and work for cheap. permalink fedilink source parent [–] barsoap@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago The difference is that we now can do video. I mean in principle that was possible before but also a hell of a lot of work. Making it look real hasn't been a problem since before Photoshop, if anything people get sloppy with AI also because a felt 99% of people who use AI don't have an artistic bone in their body. permalink fedilink source parent [–] jivandabeast@lemmy.browntown.dev 1 point 2 years ago I'm not saying that it's a shift in nature? All I've been saying is: A) tools to create realistic nudes have been publicly available ever since deepfakes became a thing B) deepfakes are worse than traditional photoshopped nudes because (as you put it, a quality improvement) they're more convincing and therefore can have more detrimental effects permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Delta_V@midwest.social 2 points 2 years ago Or maybe an accessibility improvement. You don't need to practice creating your own works of art over many years anymore, or have enough money to commission a master artist. The AI artists are good enough and work for cheap. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago The difference is that we now can do video. I mean in principle that was possible before but also a hell of a lot of work. Making it look real hasn't been a problem since before Photoshop, if anything people get sloppy with AI also because a felt 99% of people who use AI don't have an artistic bone in their body. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] jivandabeast@lemmy.browntown.dev 1 point 2 years ago I'm not saying that it's a shift in nature? All I've been saying is: A) tools to create realistic nudes have been publicly available ever since deepfakes became a thing B) deepfakes are worse than traditional photoshopped nudes because (as you put it, a quality improvement) they're more convincing and therefore can have more detrimental effects permalink fedilink source parent
[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 4 points 2 years ago There was a brief period between now and the invention of photography when that was true. For thousands of years before that it was possible to create a visual representation of anything you imagine without any hint that it wasn't something real. Makes me wonder if there were similar controversies about drawings or paintings. permalink fedilink source parent