this post was submitted on 30 Nov 2023
0 points (50.0% liked)
Apple
67 readers
2 users here now
A place for Apple news, rumors, and discussions.
founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
While I think there needs to be alternatives I suspect a lot of people will be disappointed as many developers don't alter pricing at all and we are going to see some really scummy behavior by some going forward.
I am a very infrequent user of the app store as is and we have always had freedom on the Mac platform and that just meant mostly other stores with their own embedded fee structure along with having to guess if a site and developer were trustworthy.
So we may just end up in a situation where we have a few large trusted app stores and still have to pay them all.
I’m not expecting much of a change to pricing, and I’m fine with that. It’s all the apps Apple has been blocking for all these years that I’m interested in. Particularly Firefox with its own engine, Google Assistant as the default voice assistant on iOS, and Steam as an actual distribution and installation method where we can buy iOS apps on Steam and play them on our phones.
This is a very lofty ideal. Especially something like Google assistant as a system default. That would require significant system-level changes that gave an application/service low-level access to your device. I just don’t see that happening.
Changing voice assistants is explicitly required in the DMA. There’s a lot in there in addition to sideloading. That’s why I’m surprised they’re leaving it to the last minute. It’s a huge change.
There may be small variations in pricing, but the reality is more likely developers and app companies will keep pricing the same and pocket the App Store “fees”.