▲ 543 ▼ Google is putting ads in gmail. WTF? (sh.itjust.works) submitted 2 years ago by 257m@sh.itjust.works to c/degoogle@lemmy.ml 222 comments fedilink hide all child comments Why would anyone use this over Proton Mail or the gazillion alternatives if it treats people like shit.
[–] Patches@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) A couple of pennies time a Billion users is a lot of pennies. It is probably way less than a penny per user per day. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ferralcat@monyet.cc 3 points 2 years ago (2 children) We learned this from meta didn't we? A user is worth about $15 a month? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] letsgocrazy@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago I don't even know if this is true, but I'd love to know more. Maybe we're worth £4 a month, but they just decided to pull a higher price out of their ass to dissuade everyone from paying. I suspect the small amount of people who decide to pay will cost more in infrastructure, and causes more headaches to meta anyway. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Patches@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago No we didn't. We learned they were required to offer an 'ad tracking free' experience and that they priced it at $15/month. As that experience only exists as a result of a law suit - we have no idea what a user is worth. Because they were limited by what they could charge to 'sounds reasonable' and 'unlikely to cause further lawsuits' permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ferralcat@monyet.cc 3 points 2 years ago (2 children) We learned this from meta didn't we? A user is worth about $15 a month? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] letsgocrazy@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago I don't even know if this is true, but I'd love to know more. Maybe we're worth £4 a month, but they just decided to pull a higher price out of their ass to dissuade everyone from paying. I suspect the small amount of people who decide to pay will cost more in infrastructure, and causes more headaches to meta anyway. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Patches@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago No we didn't. We learned they were required to offer an 'ad tracking free' experience and that they priced it at $15/month. As that experience only exists as a result of a law suit - we have no idea what a user is worth. Because they were limited by what they could charge to 'sounds reasonable' and 'unlikely to cause further lawsuits' permalink fedilink source parent
[–] letsgocrazy@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago I don't even know if this is true, but I'd love to know more. Maybe we're worth £4 a month, but they just decided to pull a higher price out of their ass to dissuade everyone from paying. I suspect the small amount of people who decide to pay will cost more in infrastructure, and causes more headaches to meta anyway. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Patches@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago No we didn't. We learned they were required to offer an 'ad tracking free' experience and that they priced it at $15/month. As that experience only exists as a result of a law suit - we have no idea what a user is worth. Because they were limited by what they could charge to 'sounds reasonable' and 'unlikely to cause further lawsuits' permalink fedilink source parent