Data Hoarder

442 readers

33 active

3 users here now

We are digital librarians. Among us are represented the various reasons to keep data -- legal requirements, competitive requirements, uncertainty of permanence of cloud services, distaste for transmitting your data externally (e.g. government or corporate espionage), cultural and familial archivists, internet collapse preppers, and people who do it themselves so they're sure it's done right. Everyone has their reasons for curating the data they have decided to keep (either forever or For A Damn Long Time (tm) ). Along the way we have sought out like-minded individuals to exchange strategies, war stories, and cautionary tales of failures.

founded 2 years ago

moderators

communick@selfhosted.forum

Are NAS-rated drives REALLY worth it? (alien.top)

submitted 2 years ago by I-Should-Travel@alien.top [B] to c/datahoarder@selfhosted.forum

20 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I'm not anywhere close to the point where I'll be constantly transferring data. I'll be using it mostly as a plex server, not yet remotely for other people or myself either. Is the premium for NAS drives truly warranted for the average user? Or at that point, are NAS rated drives more just the only way to get drives over 5TB~ capacity in the first place?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Far_Marsupial6303@alien.top [B] 1 point 2 years ago

Two thumbs up to those who are posting that NAS and by inferred extension, Enterprise drives aren't necessarily any better for home use.

However, since NAS/Enterprise labeling is now 98% marketing, there really isn't much of a decision necessary today. Other than the handful of drive lines HTWingNut posted and another handful of specialized surveillance drives, everything else is NAS or Enterprise.

permalink

fedilink

source