β² 297 βΌ Christian (Apollo Dev) on contributing to Voyager (reddthat.com) submitted 2 years ago by UgandaSans@reddthat.com to c/voyagerapp@lemmy.world 78 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[β] hi_its_me@lemmy.world 39 points 2 years ago (2 children) Does it need it? AFAIK, you canβt copyright a design. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [β] CaptObvious@literature.cafe 13 points 2 years ago You canβt copyright the underlying idea. You can copyright the specific expression of that idea. permalink fedilink source parent [β] WarmSoda@lemm.ee -5 points 2 years ago (2 children) Pretty sure that's exactly what copyright is for, actually permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [β] HeartyBeast@kbin.social 38 points 2 years ago (1 child) Youβre pretty sure, but you are wrong. The closest would be a design patent permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] WarmSoda@lemm.ee -1 points 2 years ago (1 child) Oh. You mean a patent for ... a design. Gotcha permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] dandi8@kbin.social 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) You must first have the patent. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago Very true permalink fedilink source parent [β] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) Pretty sure you're not a lawyer so pretty sure you CAN'T be pretty sure about this permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] WarmSoda@lemm.ee -1 points 2 years ago* Both novel fonts and computer icons can be covered by design patents. Icons are only covered, however, when they are displayed on a computer screen, thus making them part of an article of manufacture with practical utility. Screen layouts can also be protected with design patents. Not that it actually matters at all though. permalink fedilink source parent
[β] CaptObvious@literature.cafe 13 points 2 years ago You canβt copyright the underlying idea. You can copyright the specific expression of that idea. permalink fedilink source parent
[β] WarmSoda@lemm.ee -5 points 2 years ago (2 children) Pretty sure that's exactly what copyright is for, actually permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [β] HeartyBeast@kbin.social 38 points 2 years ago (1 child) Youβre pretty sure, but you are wrong. The closest would be a design patent permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] WarmSoda@lemm.ee -1 points 2 years ago (1 child) Oh. You mean a patent for ... a design. Gotcha permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] dandi8@kbin.social 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) You must first have the patent. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago Very true permalink fedilink source parent [β] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) Pretty sure you're not a lawyer so pretty sure you CAN'T be pretty sure about this permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] WarmSoda@lemm.ee -1 points 2 years ago* Both novel fonts and computer icons can be covered by design patents. Icons are only covered, however, when they are displayed on a computer screen, thus making them part of an article of manufacture with practical utility. Screen layouts can also be protected with design patents. Not that it actually matters at all though. permalink fedilink source parent
[β] HeartyBeast@kbin.social 38 points 2 years ago (1 child) Youβre pretty sure, but you are wrong. The closest would be a design patent permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] WarmSoda@lemm.ee -1 points 2 years ago (1 child) Oh. You mean a patent for ... a design. Gotcha permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] dandi8@kbin.social 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) You must first have the patent. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago Very true permalink fedilink source parent
[β] WarmSoda@lemm.ee -1 points 2 years ago (1 child) Oh. You mean a patent for ... a design. Gotcha permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] dandi8@kbin.social 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) You must first have the patent. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago Very true permalink fedilink source parent
[β] dandi8@kbin.social 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) You must first have the patent. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago Very true permalink fedilink source parent
[β] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) Pretty sure you're not a lawyer so pretty sure you CAN'T be pretty sure about this permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] WarmSoda@lemm.ee -1 points 2 years ago* Both novel fonts and computer icons can be covered by design patents. Icons are only covered, however, when they are displayed on a computer screen, thus making them part of an article of manufacture with practical utility. Screen layouts can also be protected with design patents. Not that it actually matters at all though. permalink fedilink source parent
[β] WarmSoda@lemm.ee -1 points 2 years ago* Both novel fonts and computer icons can be covered by design patents. Icons are only covered, however, when they are displayed on a computer screen, thus making them part of an article of manufacture with practical utility. Screen layouts can also be protected with design patents. Not that it actually matters at all though. permalink fedilink source parent