▲ 707 ▼ Google Chrome will limit ad blockers starting June 2024 (arstechnica.com) submitted 2 years ago by L4s@lemmy.world [M, B] to c/technology@lemmy.world 221 comments fedilink hide all child comments Google Chrome will limit ad blockers starting June 2024::The "Manifest V3" rollout is back after letting tensions cool for a year.
[+] h_a_r_u_k_i@programming.dev -4 points 2 years ago* (2 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] HorseWithNoName@lemm.ee 14 points 2 years ago (2 children) I see so many of these comments I can't help but wonder if it's an ad campaign by Kagi. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] ScreaminOctopus@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) Pretty sure it is, I ended up trying the free trial because of all the yapping. Don't bother. 99% of the results are the same as ddg. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] laurelraven@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 2 years ago +1 for ddg, it does everything needed from a search engine without the extra crap, and even if you don't turn off ads, they're reasonable and unobtrusive (and they let you turn them off very easily) permalink fedilink source parent [–] Draconic_NEO@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) It very likely is an Astroturfing campaign to try and get more users. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] yacht_boy@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) Step 1: astroturf on lemmy Step 2:? Step 3: profit! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Draconic_NEO@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago Lemmy is a poor choice for astroturfing, not because of small user count but because no one here is going to hesitate from removing their content or banning them from the site. On regular social media you can act like a shill and get downvoted and hated on, but here the punishments are actually handed out, and even if their home instance doesn't ban them others likely will, effectively crippling said campaign. These campaigns work on social media services that will protect them due to corporate interest, something that basically doesn't happen here. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Chakravanti@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago I'll take your word for it. I discarded that notion years ago. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] HorseWithNoName@lemm.ee 14 points 2 years ago (2 children) I see so many of these comments I can't help but wonder if it's an ad campaign by Kagi. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] ScreaminOctopus@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) Pretty sure it is, I ended up trying the free trial because of all the yapping. Don't bother. 99% of the results are the same as ddg. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] laurelraven@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 2 years ago +1 for ddg, it does everything needed from a search engine without the extra crap, and even if you don't turn off ads, they're reasonable and unobtrusive (and they let you turn them off very easily) permalink fedilink source parent [–] Draconic_NEO@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) It very likely is an Astroturfing campaign to try and get more users. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] yacht_boy@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) Step 1: astroturf on lemmy Step 2:? Step 3: profit! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Draconic_NEO@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago Lemmy is a poor choice for astroturfing, not because of small user count but because no one here is going to hesitate from removing their content or banning them from the site. On regular social media you can act like a shill and get downvoted and hated on, but here the punishments are actually handed out, and even if their home instance doesn't ban them others likely will, effectively crippling said campaign. These campaigns work on social media services that will protect them due to corporate interest, something that basically doesn't happen here. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ScreaminOctopus@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) Pretty sure it is, I ended up trying the free trial because of all the yapping. Don't bother. 99% of the results are the same as ddg. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] laurelraven@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 2 years ago +1 for ddg, it does everything needed from a search engine without the extra crap, and even if you don't turn off ads, they're reasonable and unobtrusive (and they let you turn them off very easily) permalink fedilink source parent
[–] laurelraven@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 2 years ago +1 for ddg, it does everything needed from a search engine without the extra crap, and even if you don't turn off ads, they're reasonable and unobtrusive (and they let you turn them off very easily) permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Draconic_NEO@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) It very likely is an Astroturfing campaign to try and get more users. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] yacht_boy@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) Step 1: astroturf on lemmy Step 2:? Step 3: profit! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Draconic_NEO@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago Lemmy is a poor choice for astroturfing, not because of small user count but because no one here is going to hesitate from removing their content or banning them from the site. On regular social media you can act like a shill and get downvoted and hated on, but here the punishments are actually handed out, and even if their home instance doesn't ban them others likely will, effectively crippling said campaign. These campaigns work on social media services that will protect them due to corporate interest, something that basically doesn't happen here. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] yacht_boy@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) Step 1: astroturf on lemmy Step 2:? Step 3: profit! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Draconic_NEO@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago Lemmy is a poor choice for astroturfing, not because of small user count but because no one here is going to hesitate from removing their content or banning them from the site. On regular social media you can act like a shill and get downvoted and hated on, but here the punishments are actually handed out, and even if their home instance doesn't ban them others likely will, effectively crippling said campaign. These campaigns work on social media services that will protect them due to corporate interest, something that basically doesn't happen here. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Draconic_NEO@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago Lemmy is a poor choice for astroturfing, not because of small user count but because no one here is going to hesitate from removing their content or banning them from the site. On regular social media you can act like a shill and get downvoted and hated on, but here the punishments are actually handed out, and even if their home instance doesn't ban them others likely will, effectively crippling said campaign. These campaigns work on social media services that will protect them due to corporate interest, something that basically doesn't happen here. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Chakravanti@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago I'll take your word for it. I discarded that notion years ago. permalink fedilink source parent