▲ 1513 ▼ 505 of 700 OpenAI employees tell the board to resign. (lemmy.dbzer0.com) submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/technology@lemmy.world 290 comments fedilink hide all child comments Source: https://twitter.com/karaswisher/status/1726599700961521762
[–] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 1 point 2 years ago* (4 children) That they will get what they want. Or that motives don't matter, dealer's choice, because I don't believe either tbh. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] the_post_of_tom_joad@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [+] the_post_of_tom_joad@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) They didn't own equity in the company, fam. This wasn't the oligarchy losing, it was the oligarchy winning, and Microsoft's investment staying secure thanks to their good little worker rats eager for a crumb of cheese. I can't honestly say I'm surprised the board doesn't have a spine, though. They took Microsoft's poisoned pill in the first place, it's clear their actual principles on AI ethics ends when the road gets bumpy. I would suggest you look at their new board members and ask yourself if they'll be protecting the idea of AI being a benefit to humanity, or if they're just more of those "parasites" you mentioned. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] the_post_of_tom_joad@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[+] the_post_of_tom_joad@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[+] the_post_of_tom_joad@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) They didn't own equity in the company, fam. This wasn't the oligarchy losing, it was the oligarchy winning, and Microsoft's investment staying secure thanks to their good little worker rats eager for a crumb of cheese. I can't honestly say I'm surprised the board doesn't have a spine, though. They took Microsoft's poisoned pill in the first place, it's clear their actual principles on AI ethics ends when the road gets bumpy. I would suggest you look at their new board members and ask yourself if they'll be protecting the idea of AI being a benefit to humanity, or if they're just more of those "parasites" you mentioned. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] the_post_of_tom_joad@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) They didn't own equity in the company, fam. This wasn't the oligarchy losing, it was the oligarchy winning, and Microsoft's investment staying secure thanks to their good little worker rats eager for a crumb of cheese. I can't honestly say I'm surprised the board doesn't have a spine, though. They took Microsoft's poisoned pill in the first place, it's clear their actual principles on AI ethics ends when the road gets bumpy. I would suggest you look at their new board members and ask yourself if they'll be protecting the idea of AI being a benefit to humanity, or if they're just more of those "parasites" you mentioned. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] the_post_of_tom_joad@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[+] the_post_of_tom_joad@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent