A BBC presenter has been accused of paying a teenager for sexually explicit photographs, beginning when they were 17, according to The Sun.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 4 points 3 years ago (2 children)

I don't mind paying a licence fee if it goes towards Sir David etc. But you've got to question wages that allow 'tens of thousands' to be splashed (oo-er) in only three years.

And BBC wonder why people complain about them.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments