343
Now that you've all tried it ... ChatGPT web traffic falls 10% (www.theregister.com)
submitted 3 years ago by [M, B] to c/technology@lemmy.world
118 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Slow June, people voting with their feet amid this AI craze, or something else?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 21 points 3 years ago (8 children)

For my professional work, the training data is way too outdated by now for ChatGPT to be anywhere near being useful. The browsing feature also can’t make up for it, because it’s pretty bad at Internet search (bad search phrases etc).

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
    •
  • [–] 11 points 3 years ago (7 children)

    i find even for really complex stuff it’s pretty good as long as you direct it: it can suggest some things, you can do some searching based on that, maybe give it a few links to summarise for you, etc

    it doesn’t do the work for you, but it makes a pretty good assistant that doesn’t quite understand the subject matter

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 3 years ago (6 children)

    I'm old enough to not needing a babysitter to use the Internet for research.

    It even told me a few times that its training data is too outdated and that there probably was some progress in that area. I have to freaking push it to actually do a web search to update that knowledge with prompts like “You have web access, use it!”. It then finds a few posts on stackoverflow I've already seen and draws some incorrect conclusions from that.

    I'm way faster on my own.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago (3 children)

    Try out Bing, I like it a lot more over gpt. Works in Edge only though

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    In my experience, Bing Chat is even worse, because it skips the part where ChatGPT is trying to come up with something based on the training data and goes straight to bad web searches with incorrect summaries.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago* (1 child)

    your experience does not match mine

    which is not saying that your experience is wrong or that you’re using it wrong, however i and many others have managed to get exceptionally good results out of it, and you should be aware of that fact

    referring to these experiences as “needing a babysitter” is needlessly provocative as well; we’re all just talking here: no need to insult the intelligence of anyone that has managed to use the tool in a way that works incredibly well

    i hope that at some point in the future, you’re able to have your experience match ours, and have a similar feeling of “ooooh i see now… wait… OOOOOOH I REALLY SEEEE NOW”

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago

    Well, I hope that some day I will have the same experience.

    I think the main problem is that I'm only prompting it with lost causes, when I was unable to find anything on my own with very thorough searches, because there just isn’t an answer available online.

    I don’t go there first, because I'm always afraid of hallucinated answers, which are very common. For example, it often just tries to guess function names of programming libraries. That’s just wasting my time.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent